The Current Status of the Philosophy of Biology-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Current Status of the Philosophy of Biology

Published:2011-04-23 Issue:1 Volume:22 Page:5-48
ISSN:0926-7220
Container-title:Science & Education
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci & Educ

Author:

Takacs Peter,Ruse Michael

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-011-9356-1.pdf

Reference317 articles.

1. Allen, C., Bekoff, M., & Lauder, G. (1998). Nature’s purposes: Analyses of function and design in biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

2. Amundson, R. (2002). Phylogenic reconstruction then and now. Biology and Philosophy, 17(5), 679–694.

3. Ariew, A., Cummins, R., & Perlman, M. (Eds.). (2002). Functions: New essays in the philosophy of psychology and biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

4. Ariew, A., & Ernst, Z. (2009). What fitness can’t be. Erkenntnis, 71(3), 289–301.

5. Ariew, A., & Lewontin, R. C. (2004). The confusions of fitness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 347–363.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ways of Knowing in the Life Sciences and Connections to the NGSS Practice-Crosscutting Concept Pairs and Groups;The American Biology Teacher;2024-05-01

2. A Critique of Current Philosophy of Biology;History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences;2024

3. The Notion of Scientific Knowledge in Biology;Science & Education;2016-01-27

4. Neither logical empiricism nor vitalism, but organicism: what the philosophy of biology was;History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences;2015-10-09

5. The Human Dark Side: Evolutionary Psychology and Original Sin;Journal of Religion and Health;2013-12-11