1. Albury, W. R. (1986). The order of ideas: Condillac’s method of analysis as a political instrument in the French revolution. In J. A. Schuster & R. R. Yeo (Eds.). The politics and rhetoric of scientific method (pp. 203–225). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
2. Aykroyd, W. R. (1935). Three philosophers: Lavoisier, Priestley, and Cavendish. London: Heinemann.
3. Basu, P. K. (1992). Similarities and dissimilarities between Joseph Priestley’s and Antoine Lavoisier’s Chemical Beliefs. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23(3), 445–469.
4. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (1993). Lavoisier: Memoires d’une revolution. Paris: Flammarian.
5. Bensaude-Vincent, B., & Simon, J. (2008). Chemistry: The impure science. London: Imperial College Press.