1. Angell, C., Kind, P. M., Henriksen, E. K., & Guttersrud, O. (2008). An empirical-mathematical modeling approach to upper secondary physics. Physics Education, 43(3), 256.
2. Bagno, E., Berger, H., & Eylon, B. S. (2008). Meeting the challenge of students’ understanding of formulae in high-school physics: A learning tool. Physics Education, 43(1), 75.
3. Basson, I. (2002). Physics and mathematics as interrelated fields of thought development using acceleration as an example. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33(5), 679. doi: 10.1080/00207390210146023 .
4. van den Berg, E., Ellermeijer, A. L., & Slooten, O. (Eds.) (2006). In Proceedings GIREP conference 2006: Modelling in physics and physics education, GIREP, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
5. Bing, T. J., & Redish, E. F. (2009). Analyzing problem solving using math in physics: Epistemological framing via warrants. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 5(2). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.02010 .