Abstract
AbstractThis study demonstrates how an evolving negative educational gradient of single parenthood can interact with changing labour market conditions to shape labour market inequalities between partnered and single parents. We analysed trends in employment rates among Finnish partnered and single mothers and fathers from 1987 to 2018. In the late 1980s’ Finland, single mothers’ employment was internationally high and on par with that of partnered mothers, and single fathers’ employment rate was just below that of partnered fathers. The gaps between single and partnered parents emerged and increased during the 1990s recession, and after the 2008 economic crisis, it widened further. In 2018, the employment rates of single parents were 11–12 percentage points lower than those of partnered parents. We ask how much of this single-parent employment gap could be explained by compositional factors, and the widening educational gradient of single parenthood in particular. We use Chevan and Sutherland’s decomposition technique on register data, which allows us to decompose the single-parent employment gap into the composition and rate effects by each category of the background variables. The findings point to an increasing double disadvantage of single parents: the gradually evolving disadvantage in educational backgrounds together with large differences in employment rates between single and partnered parents with low education explain large parts of the widening employment gap. Sociodemographic changes in interaction with changes in the labour market can produce inequalities by family structure in a Nordic society known for its extensive support for combining childcare and employment for all parents.
Funder
academy of finland
horizon 2020 framework programme
norface
European University Institute - Fiesole
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference78 articles.
1. Ahn, H. (2012). Child care subsidy, child care costs, and employment of low-income single mothers. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(2), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.11.010
2. Asplund, R., & Maliranta, M. (2006). Productivity growth: The role of human capital and technology. In J. Ojala, J. Eloranta, & J. Jalava (Eds.), The road to prosperity. An economic history of Finland (pp. 263–284). Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
3. Bargain, O., Orsini, K., & Peichl, A. (2014). Comparing labor supply elasticities in Europe and the United States: New results. Journal of Human Resources, 49(3), 723–838. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.49.3.723
4. Bergsvik, J., Kitterød, R. H., & Wiik, K. A. (2020). Parenthood and couples’ relative earnings in Norway. European Sociological Review, 36(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz062
5. Bernardi, F., & Boertien, D. (2017). Non-intact families and diverging educational destinies: A decomposition analysis for Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Social Science Research, 63(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.004
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献