Time-dependent recruitment of GAF, ISGF3 and IRF1 complexes shapes IFNα and IFNγ-activated transcriptional responses and explains mechanistic and functional overlap

Abstract

AbstractTo understand in detail the transcriptional and functional overlap of IFN-I- and IFN-II-activated responses, we used an integrative RNAseq-ChIPseq approach in Huh7.5 cells and characterized the genome-wide role of pSTAT1, pSTAT2, IRF9 and IRF1 in time-dependent ISG expression. For the first time, our results provide detailed insight in the timely steps of IFNα- and IFNγ-induced transcription, in which pSTAT1- and pSTAT2-containing ISGF3 and GAF-like complexes and IRF1 are recruited to individual or combined ISRE and GAS composite sites in a phosphorylation- and time-dependent manner. Interestingly, composite genes displayed a more heterogeneous expression pattern, as compared to GAS (early) and ISRE genes (late), with the time- and phosphorylation-dependent recruitment of GAF, ISGF3 and IRF1 after IFNα stimulation and GAF and IRF1 after IFNγ. Moreover, functional composite genes shared features of GAS and ISRE genes through transcription factor co-binding to closely located sites, and were able to sustain IFN responsiveness in STAT1-, STAT2-, IRF9-, IRF1- and IRF9/IRF1-mutant Huh7.5 cells compared to Wt cells. Thus, the ISRE + GAS composite site acted as a molecular switch, depending on the timely available components and transcription factor complexes. Consequently, STAT1, STAT2 and IRF9 were identified as functional composite genes that are part of a positive feedback loop controlling long-term IFNα and IFNγ responses. More important, in the absence of any one of the components, the positive feedback regulation of the ISGF3 and GAF components appeared to be preserved. Together, these findings provide further insight in the existence of a novel ISRE + GAS composite-dependent intracellular amplifier circuit prolonging ISG expression and controlling cellular responsiveness to different types of IFNs and subsequent antiviral activity. It also offers an explanation for the existing molecular and functional overlap between IFN-I- and IFN-II-activated ISG expression.