Author:
Peper J.,Becker L. M.,Bruning T. A.,Budde R. P. J.,van Dockum W. G.,Frederix G. W. J.,Habets J.,Henriques J. P. S.,Houthuizen P.,Mohamed Hoesein F. A. A.,Planken R. N.,Voskuil M.,Bots M. L.,Leiner T.,Swaans M. J.
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundIn patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), revascularisation decisions are based mainly on the visual grading of the severity of coronary stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current standard to determine the haemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis. Non-invasive and less-invasive imaging techniques such as computed-tomography-derived FFR (FFR-CT) and angiography-derived FFR (QFR) combine both anatomical and functional information in complex algorithms to calculate FFR.Trial designThe iCORONARY trial is a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a blinded endpoint evaluation. It investigates the costs, effects and outcomes of different diagnostic strategies to evaluate the presence of CAD and the need for revascularisation in patients with stable angina pectoris who undergo coronary computed tomography angiography. Those with a Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) score between 0–2 and 5 will be included in a prospective registry, whereas patients with CAD-RADS 3 or 4A will be enrolled in the RCT. The RCT consists of three randomised groups: (1) FFR-CT-guided strategy, (2) QFR-guided strategy or (3) standard of care including ICA and invasive pressure measurements for all intermediate stenoses. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation) at 1 year. Clinicaltrials.gov-identifier: NCT04939207.ConclusionThe iCORONARY trial will assess whether a strategy of FFR-CT or QFR is non-inferior to invasive angiography to guide the need for revascularisation in patients with stable CAD. Non-inferiority to the standard of care implies that these techniques are attractive, less-invasive alternatives to current diagnostic pathways.
Funder
ZonMw
Health Incurance Companies Netherlands
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference20 articles.
1. Al-Hijji MA, Lennon RJ, Gulati R, et al. Safety and risk of major complications with diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1–9.
2. Zorginstituut Nederland. Verbetersignalement Pijn op de borst (verdenking) stabiele angina pectoris. 2018. https://www.zorginstituutnederland.nl/binaries/zinl/documenten/rapport/2018/01/31/zinnige-zorg-verbetersignalement-%E2%80%98pijn-op-de-borst%E2%80%99/Rapport+pijn+op+de+borst.pdf. Accessed 11.09.2021.
3. Tragardh E, Tan SS, Bucerius J, et al. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with ischaemic heart disease. A report from the cardiovascular committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Endorsed by the European Association of Cardi. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:825–32.
4. Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. CAD-RADS™: coronary artery disease—reporting and data system: an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(12 Pt A):1458–1466.e9.
5. Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8:342–58.