Abstract
AbstractMany species on endangered species lists such as the IUCN Red List (RL) are categorized using demographic factors such as numbers of mature individuals. Genetic factors are not currently used in the RL even though their explicit consideration, including effective population size (Ne) and expected heterozygosity-loss (H-loss), could improve the assessment of extinction risk. Here, we consider the estimation of Ne and H-loss in the context of RL species. First, we investigate the reporting of number of mature individuals for RL Endangered species, which is needed to estimate Ne and H-loss. We found 77% of species assessments studied here did not report methods used to estimate the number of mature adults, and that these assessments rarely report other important determinants of Ne (e.g., sex ratio, variance in family size). We therefore applied common rules of thumb to estimate Ne, and found that Ne was likely < 50 for at least 25% of the 170 RL Endangered species studied here. We also estimated mean expected H-loss for these species over the next 100 years, and found it to be 9–29%. These estimates of high H-loss and low Ne suggest that some species listed as Endangered likely warrant listing as Critically Endangered if genetic considerations were included. We recommend that RL and other assessment frameworks (i) report methods used for estimating the number of mature adults, (ii) include standardized information on species traits that influence Ne to facilitate Ne estimation, and (iii) consider using concepts like Ne and heterozygosity-loss in risk assessments.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference51 articles.
1. Akçakaya HR et al (2018) Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species. Conserv Biol 32(5):1128–1138
2. Allendorf FW, Ryman N (2002) The role of genetics in population viability analysis. In: Beissinger SR, McCullough DR (eds) Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 50–85
3. Allendorf FW et al (2013) Conservation and the genetics of populations, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
4. Andrews KR et al (2016) Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet 17(2):81–92
5. Beaumont M, Wang J (2019) Conservation genetics. In: Balding J, Moltke I, Marioni J (eds) Handbook of statistical genomics, vol 1, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Cited by
80 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献