Mitochondrial DNA diversity of the eastern black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis michaeli) in Tanzania: implications for future conservation
-
Published:2023-07-27
Issue:6
Volume:24
Page:905-919
-
ISSN:1566-0621
-
Container-title:Conservation Genetics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Conserv Genet
Author:
Mellya Ronald V. K.,Hopcraft J. Grant C.,Eblate Ernest M.,Kariuki Linus,Otiende Moses,Chuma Idrissa S.,Macha Emmanuel S.,Wambura Dickson,Kilbride Elizabeth,Mable Barbara K.
Abstract
AbstractThere has been a drastic decline in the number of eastern black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis michaeli) across Africa, leaving individuals restricted to small, isolated populations that are vulnerable to extinction. Focusing on highly threatened populations in Tanzania, this study investigated the genetic impacts of past management interventions on mitochondrial control region diversity in extant subpopulations, assessed whether there has been evidence of dispersal of females between populations based on haplotype sharing, and related current haplotype diversity to historical patterns. Across extant subpopulations in Tanzania, six maternal haplotypes were identified, with an overall haplotype diversity of h = 0.72 but lower overall nucleotide diversity within populations (π = 0.017) compared to historical populations (π = 0.021). Translocated populations did not share haplotypes with native populations, even though all haplotypes from translocated individuals had been found among historic samples from Kenya. This suggests that translocations have been successful at restoring previous diversity to the region but that the current Intensive Protection Zone (IPZ) management practices have restricted the movement of females between subpopulations. Extant haplotypes were distributed among three East African haplogroups described in previous studies, suggesting that multiple lineages have been preserved despite the loss of historical haplotypes. Our recommendation is to enhance the utilisation of previous translocations by enabling the natural movements of individuals between subpopulations. Such a change in management strategy could be less costly both economically and in terms of animal welfare than the alternative of using genetic data to target specific animals for translocation in order to supplement diversity.
Funder
National Geographic early career grants
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference41 articles.
1. Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, Heled J, Jones G, Kühnert D, De Maio N (2019) BEAST 2.5: an advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS computational biology 15:e1006650 2. Brown SM, Houlden BA (2000) Conservation genetics of the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis). Conserv Genet 1:365–370. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011579807460 3. Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63:215–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/5542 4. Chipman R, Slate D, Rupprecht C, Mendoza M (2008) Downside risk of wildlife translocation. Dev Biol (basel) 131:223–232 5. Cumming, DHM, du Toit, RF, Stuart, SN, Cumming, DHM, du Toit, RF, Stuart, SN (1990) African elephants and rhinos. Status survey and conservation action plan. In: African elephants and rhinos Status survey and conservation action plan, pp. i-iv, 1–72. IUCN, Gland,
|
|