Abstract
AbstractLitter meadows, historically established for litter production, are species-rich and diverse ecosystems. These meadows drastically declined during the last decades along with decreasing litter use in modern livestock housing. The aim of our study was to identify the drivers of genetic variation in litter meadow species. Therefore, we tested whether genetic diversity and differentiation depend on habitat age, landscape structure, habitat quality, and/or population size. We analysed 892 individuals of Angelica sylvestris, Filipendula ulmaria, and Succisa pratensis from 20 litter meadows across the Allgäu in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) using AFLP analyses. All study species showed moderate levels of genetic diversity, while genetic differentiation among populations was low. Neither genetic diversity nor differentiation were clearly driven by habitat age. However, landscape structure, habitat quality as well as population size revealed different impacts on the genetic diversity of our study species. Past and present landscape structures shaped the genetic diversity patterns of A. sylvestris and F. ulmaria. The genetic diversity of F. ulmaria populations was, moreover, influenced by the local habitat quality. S. pratensis populations seemed to be affected only by population size. All explanatory variables represent past as well as present gene flow patterns by anthropogenic land use. Therefore, we assume that genetic diversity and differentiation were shaped by both historical creation of litter meadows via hay transfer and present mowing with agricultural machines. These land use practices caused and still cause gene flow among populations in the declining habitats.
Funder
Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference88 articles.
1. Adriaens D, Honnay O, Hermy M (2006) No evidence of a plant extinction debt in highly fragmented calcareous grasslands in Belgium. Biol Conserv 133:212–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.006
2. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L et al (2008) Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations : susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol Ecol 17:5177–5188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03971.x
3. Baessler C, Klotz S, Durka W (2010) Temporal changes and spatial determinants of plant species diversity and genetic variation. In: Müller F, Baessler C, Schubert C, Klotz S (eds) Long-term ecological research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 279–297
4. Balmford A, Bennun L, Ten Brink B et al (2005) The convention on biological diversity’s 2010 target. Science 307:212–213. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106281
5. Barrett SCH, Kohn JR (1991) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献