Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers’ compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers’ compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF

Published:2023-01-13 Issue:2 Volume:165 Page:315-323
ISSN:0942-0940
Container-title:Acta Neurochirurgica
language:en
Short-container-title:Acta Neurochir

Author:

Nie James W.^ORCID,Hartman Timothy J.^ORCID,Oyetayo Omolabake O.^ORCID,MacGregor Keith R.^ORCID,Zheng Eileen^ORCID,Massel Dustin H.^ORCID,Singh Kern^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-022-05468-4.pdf

Reference19 articles.

1. Brodke DS, Goz V, Voss MW, Lawrence BD, Spiker WR, Hung M (2017) PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 Physical Function Domain in spine patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(12):921–929

2. Chen DA, Vaishnav AS, Louie PK et al (2020) Patient reported outcomes in patients who stop following up: Are they doing better or worse than the patients that come back? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45(20):1435–1442

3. Costa MA, Silva PS, Vaz R, Pereira P (2021) Correlation between clinical outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar stenosis undergoing decompression surgery. Eur Spine J 30(4):928–935

4. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Takemoto M, Ota M, Nakamura T (2010) Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 13(4):500–508

5. Haws BE, Khechen B, Guntin JA, Cardinal KL, Bohl DD, Singh K (2018) Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation. J Neurosurg Spine 29(1):28–33