Microsurgical management of midbrain cavernous malformations: does lesion depth influence the outcome?

Author:

Huang Caiquan,Bertalanffy HelmutORCID,Kar Souvik,Tsuji Yoshihito

Abstract

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the intrinsic depth of midbrain cavernous malformations (MCMs) influenced the surgical outcome. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective study of 76 consecutive patients who underwent microsurgical resection of a MCM. The vascular lesions were categorized into 4 distinct groups based on how these lesions had altered the brainstem surface. Additionally, it was verified whether the actual aspect of the brainstem surface could be predicted only by evaluating the pertinent preoperative MRI slices. Clinical outcome was assessed by determining the modified Rankin Scale Score (mRS) before and after surgery. Results Twenty-three MCMs (30.3%) were located deeply within the midbrain. The overlying midbrain surface appeared to be normal (group nl). In 33 patients (43.4%), the midbrain surface showed only a yellowish discoloration (group yw). In another 14 individuals (18.4%), the midbrain surface was distorted by the underlying MCM and bulging out while the vascular lesion still remained covered by a thin parenchymal layer (group bg). In the smallest group comprising 6 patients (7.9%), the exophytic MCM had disrupted the midbrain surface and was clearly visible at microsurgical exposure (group ex). The mean mRS decreased in the group nl from 1.43 preoperatively to 0.61 at follow-up. Conclusion This study demonstrates in a large patient population that a deep intrinsic MCM location is not necessarily associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome after microsurgical lesionectomy. Predicting the aspect of the midbrain surface by evaluating preoperative MR images alone was not sufficiently reliable.

Funder

INI – International Neuroscience Institute Hannover GmbH

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3