Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Prolactinoma account to the most common pituitary adenomas and current therapy regime constitutes of dopamine agonist therapy (DA) and surgery in selected cases [17]. Due to tumor fibrosis induced by previous DA therapy, surgical removal can be challenging though. Therefore, this study investigates how preoperative DA usage influences perioperative treatment and surgical outcome in prolactinoma and aims to ascertain whether a specific subgroup of prolactinoma patients could derive greater benefit from exclusive surgical intervention.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed n = 159 surgically treated and histologically confirmed prolactinomas in the sella region from 2013–2022 in our institution. Clinical, radiological and surgical features were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
Results
Out of total of 159 prolactinoma patients, 83.6% received previous treatment with DA followed by surgery, while only 16.4% received exclusive surgery. Both groups presented similar initial tumor volumes (1.9cm3 vs. 1.5cm3, p = 0.59) and equal preoperative prolactin levels (PRL) (199.7 µg/l vs. 191.0 µg/l, p = 0.44). Surgical procedures took significantly longer when patients received prior DA treatment (79 min. vs. 70 min., p = 0.0479). Six months after surgery, pretreated patients revealed significantly higher PRL compared to non-treated (107 g/l vs. 8.64 µg/, p = 0.0009). Additionally, untreated microprolactinoma presented a remission of 100%, whereas pretreated exhibited a remission rate of 88.75%.
Conclusion
The current study demonstrates that prior DA treatment is associated with significantly longer surgeries, higher recurrence rates and lower rates of normalization of PRL levels after surgery, particularly in microprolactinomas and support the latest recommendations of the Pituitary Society's Consensus Statement 2023, which favors the option of surgery alone as first-line therapy for microprolactinomas.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Asa SL, Mete O, Perry A, Osamura RY (2022) Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors. Endocr Pathol 33(1):6–26
2. Bevan JS, Webster J, Burke CW, Scanlon MF (1992) Dopamine agonists and pituitary tumor shrinkage. Endocr Rev 13(2):220–240
3. Daly AF, Rixhon M, Adam C, Dempegioti A, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A (2006) High Prevalence of Pituitary Adenomas: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Province of Liège. Belgium J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91(12):4769–4775
4. Delgrange E, Trouillas J, Maiter D, Donckier J, Tourniaire J (1997) Sex-related difference in the growth of prolactinomas: a clinical and proliferation marker study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82(7):2102–2107
5. Donegan D, Atkinson JLD, Jentoft M, Natt N, Nippoldt TB, Erickson B, Meyer F, Erickson D (2017) Surgical outcomes of prolactinomas in recent era: results of a heterogenous group. Endocr Pract 23(1):37–45