Effect of the pipeline embolization device placement on branching vessels in anterior circulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background and purpose Pipeline embolization device (PED) is widely used in intracranial aneurysms, and the scope of applications for the PED, which is frequently used to treat cerebral aneurysms, is also growing. It has some effect on branching vessels as a result of its inherent properties. The effects of PED on the complications rate and branching vessels blockage have not yet been thoroughly investigated. Objective We conducted a systematic review searching reports from multiple databases on PED use for intracranial aneurysms, and analyzed the influence of PED on the occlusion rate of different branching vessels, and the influence of the amount of PED on the occlusion rate of branching vessels by meta-analysis. Methods We searched the literature using PUBMED, Web of Science, and OVID databases until August 2023. Inclusion criteria were that the study used only PED, included at least 10 patients, and recorded branching vessels occlusion rates, mortality, and neurological complications. Results Nine studies were analyzed consisting of 706 patients with 986 side branches. The results of the meta-analysis showed that application of more than one PED did not significantly elevate the rate of branching vessels occlusion compared to application of one PED (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.43; P = 0.33). In the comparison of branching vessels occlusion rates in the anterior circulation, the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) had a significantly higher occlusion rate compared to the ophthalmic artery (OphA) (OR = 6.54; 95% CI: 3.05 to 14.01; P < 0.01), ACA also had a higher occlusion rate compared to the anterior choroidal artery (AchA) (OR = 15.44; 95% CI: 4.11 to 57.94 P < 0.01), ACA versus posterior communicating artery (PcomA) occlusion rate difference was not statistically significant (OR = 2.58; 95% CI: 0.63 to 12.82; P = 0.17), OphA versus AchA occlusion rate difference was not statistically significant (OR = 2.56; 95% CI: 0.89 to 7.38; P = 0.08), and the occlusion rate was significantly higher for PcomA compared to AchA (OR = 7.22; 95% CI: 2.49 to 20.95; P < 0.01) and lower for OphA compared to PcomA (OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.55; P < 0.01). Conclusion The meta-analysis shows that use of multiple PEDs did not significantly increase the occlusion rate of branching vessels, and the larger the diameter of branching vessels covered by PED, the higher the occlusion rate of branching vessels. However, the incidence of complications is low after branching vessels occlusion in anterior circulation, which is related to the collateral circulation compensation of the branching vessels.