Abstract
Abstract
Study design
Systematic review.
Background
Although degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most prevalent spinal cord condition worldwide, the pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Our objective was to evaluate existing histological findings of DCM on cadaveric human spinal cord tissue and explore their consistency with animal models.
Methods
MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched (CRD42021281462) for primary research reporting on histological findings of DCM in human cadaveric spinal cord tissue. Data was extracted using a piloted proforma. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Findings were compared to a systematic review of animal models (Ahkter et al. 2020 Front Neurosci 14).
Results
The search yielded 4127 unique records. After abstract and full-text screening, 19 were included in the final analysis, reporting on 150 autopsies (71% male) with an average age at death of 67.3 years. All findings were based on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The most commonly reported grey matter findings included neuronal loss and cavity formation. The most commonly reported white matter finding was demyelination. Axon loss, gliosis, necrosis and Schwann cell proliferation were also reported. Findings were consistent amongst cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Cavitation was notably more prevalent in human autopsies compared to animal models.
Conclusion
Few human spinal cord tissue studies have been performed. Neuronal loss, demyelination and cavitation were common findings. Investigating the biological basis of DCM is a critical research priority. Human spinal cord specimen may be an underutilised but complimentary approach.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Surgery
Reference61 articles.
1. Ahmed R (2019) Agent based model of cavitation in spinal cord injury. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Agent-Based-Model-of-Cavitation-in-Spinal-Cord-Ahmed/000999900eada0918f9bf0efd464c7c8796b5e4b. Accessed 26 Apr 2022
2. Akter F, Yu X, Qin X, Yao S, Nikrouz P, Syed YA, Kotter M (2020) The pathophysiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the physiology of recovery following decompression. Front Neurosci 0. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00138
3. Akter F, Yu X, Qin X, Yao S, Nikrouz P, Syed YA, Kotter M (2020) The pathophysiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the physiology of recovery following decompression. Front Neurosci vol. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00138
4. Akter F, Kotter M (2018) Pathobiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 29:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.015
5. Al-Mefty O, Harkey HL, Marawi I, Haines DE, Peeler DF, Wilner HI, Smith RR, Holaday HR, Haining JL, Russell WF, Harrison B, Middleton TH (1993) Experimental chronic compressive cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg 79:550–561. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.79.4.0550
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献