Affiliation:
1. The First School of Clinical Medicine Lanzhou University 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China
2. Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province Gansu Provincial Hospital 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China
3. The First Clinical Medical College Gansu University of Chinese Medicine 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China
4. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine Gansu Provincial Hospital 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China
5. Evidence‐Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences Lanzhou University 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundLaparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (LHLL) has been used to treat bile duct stones with unclear outcomes. A meta‐analysis was conducted to investigate the LHLL and laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) efficacy and safety in treating bile duct stones.MethodsThe correlational studies were searched databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP, to identify eligible studies from inception to July 2022. The dichotomous and continuous outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Stata 15.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software helped in data analyses.ResultsA total of 23 studies with 1,890 patients, primarily from China, were included. The results indicated that operation time (WMD = − 26.94; 95% CI:(− 34.30, − 19.58); P < 0.00001), estimated blood loss (WMD = − 17.97; 95% CI: (− 22.94, − 13.00); P = 0.002), rate of residual stone (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: (0.10, 0.23); P < 0.00001), length of hospital stay (WMD = − 2.88; 95% CI:(− 3.80, − 1.96); P < 0.00001) and time to bowel function recovery (WMD = − 0.59; 95% CI: (− 0.76, − 0.41); P < 0.00001) had statistically significant differences between the two groups. In postoperative complications, biliary leakage (RD = ‐0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.05, ‐0.00); P = 0.02), infection (RD = − 0.06; 95% CI: (− 0.09,− 0.03); P < 0.00001) and Hepatic injury (RD = − 0.06; 95% CI: (− 0.11, − 0.01); P = 0.02) revealed statistically significant differences. However, no significant differences were observed in biliary damage (RD = − 0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.06, 0.00); P = 0.06) and hemobilia (RD = − 0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.06, 0.00); P = 0.08).ConclusionThe current meta‐analysis indicated that LHLL could be more effective and safer than LBDC. However, these results should be confirmed with a larger sample size and rigorously designed randomized controlled trials.
Funder
Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Gansu Provincial Youth Science and Technology Fund Program
Gansu Provincial Hospital project
Key talent project of Gansu Province of the Organization Department of Gansu Provincial Party Committee
grants from The 2021 Central-Guided Local Science and Technology Development Fund
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献