Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Holmium laser Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Liu Bin12,Fu Liangyin3,Lu Tingting4,Zhang Guangming3,Dong Xiaohua12,Zhao Qiqi2,Yu Miao2,Ma Haizhong2,Yang Kehu5,Cai Hui12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The First School of Clinical Medicine Lanzhou University 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China

2. Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province Gansu Provincial Hospital 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China

3. The First Clinical Medical College Gansu University of Chinese Medicine 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China

4. Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence Based Medicine Gansu Provincial Hospital 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China

5. Evidence‐Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences Lanzhou University 730000 Lanzhou Gansu Province China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLaparoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (LHLL) has been used to treat bile duct stones with unclear outcomes. A meta‐analysis was conducted to investigate the LHLL and laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) efficacy and safety in treating bile duct stones.MethodsThe correlational studies were searched databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP, to identify eligible studies from inception to July 2022. The dichotomous and continuous outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Stata 15.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software helped in data analyses.ResultsA total of 23 studies with 1,890 patients, primarily from China, were included. The results indicated that operation time (WMD = − 26.94; 95% CI:(− 34.30, − 19.58); P < 0.00001), estimated blood loss (WMD = − 17.97; 95% CI: (− 22.94, − 13.00); P = 0.002), rate of residual stone (OR = 0.15, 95%CI: (0.10, 0.23); P < 0.00001), length of hospital stay (WMD = − 2.88; 95% CI:(− 3.80, − 1.96); P < 0.00001) and time to bowel function recovery (WMD = − 0.59; 95% CI: (− 0.76, − 0.41); P < 0.00001) had statistically significant differences between the two groups. In postoperative complications, biliary leakage (RD = ‐0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.05, ‐0.00); P = 0.02), infection (RD = − 0.06; 95% CI: (− 0.09,− 0.03); P < 0.00001) and Hepatic injury (RD = − 0.06; 95% CI: (− 0.11, − 0.01); P = 0.02) revealed statistically significant differences. However, no significant differences were observed in biliary damage (RD = − 0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.06, 0.00); P = 0.06) and hemobilia (RD = − 0.03; 95% CI: (− 0.06, 0.00); P = 0.08).ConclusionThe current meta‐analysis indicated that LHLL could be more effective and safer than LBDC. However, these results should be confirmed with a larger sample size and rigorously designed randomized controlled trials.

Funder

Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Gansu Provincial Youth Science and Technology Fund Program

Gansu Provincial Hospital project

Key talent project of Gansu Province of the Organization Department of Gansu Provincial Party Committee

grants from The 2021 Central-Guided Local Science and Technology Development Fund

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3