Impact of Unplanned Intra‐Operative Conversions on Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMinimally‐invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) is fraught with the risk of complication‐related deaths (LEOPARD‐2), a significant volume‐outcome relationship and a long learning curve. With rates of conversion for MIPD approaching 40%, the impact of these on overall patient outcomes, especially, when unplanned, are yet to be fully elucidated. This study aimed to compare peri‐operative outcomes of (unplanned) converted MIPD against both successfully completed MIPD and upfront open PD.MethodsA systematic review of major reference databases was undertaken. The primary outcome of interest was 30‐day mortality. Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to judge the quality of the studies. Meta‐analysis was performed using pooled estimates, derived using random effects model.ResultsSix studies involving 20,267 patients were included in the review. Pooled analysis demonstrated (unplanned) converted MIPD were associated with an increased 30‐day (RR 2.83, CI 1.62‐ 4.93, p = 0.0002, I2 = 0%) and 90‐day (RR 1.81, CI 1.16‐ 2.82, p = 0.009, I2 = 28%) mortality and overall morbidity (RR 1.41, CI 1.09; 1.82, p = 0.0087, I2 = 82%) compared to successfully completed MIPD. Patients undergoing (unplanned) converted MIPD experienced significantly higher 30‐day mortality (RR 3.97, CI 2.07; 7.65, p < 0.0001,I2 = 0%), pancreatic fistula (RR 1.65, CI 1.22‐ 2.23, p = 0.001, I2 = 0%) and re‐exploration rates (RR 1.96, CI 1.17‐ 3.28,p = 0.01, I2 = 37%) compared upfront open PD.ConclusionsPatient outcomes are significantly compromised following unplanned intraoperative conversions of MIPD when compared to successfully completed MIPD and upfront open PD. These findings stress the need for objective evidence‐based guidelines for patient selection for MIPD.