The Estimate of the Impact of Coccyx Resection in Surgical Field Exposure During Abdominal Perineal Resection Using Preoperative High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Estimate of the Impact of Coccyx Resection in Surgical Field Exposure During Abdominal Perineal Resection Using Preoperative High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance

Published:2018-05-30 Issue:11 Volume:42 Page:3765-3770
ISSN:0364-2313
Container-title:World Journal of Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:World J Surg

Author:

São Julião Guilherme Pagin,Ortega Cinthia D.,Vailati Bruna Borba,Coutinho Francisco A. B.,Rossi Gustavo,Habr-Gama Angelita,Fernandez Laura Melina,Araújo Sérgio Eduardo Alonso,Brown Gina,Perez Rodrigo Oliva

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-018-4683-x/fulltext.html

Reference16 articles.

1. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA et al (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264

2. Bosch SL, Nagtegaal ID (2012) The importance of the pathologist’s role in assessment of the quality of the mesorectum. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 8:90–98

3. Shihab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR et al (2010) Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:53–56

4. How P, Shihab O, Tekkis P et al (2011) A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era. Surg Oncol 20:e149–155

5. Prytz M, Angenete E, Bock D et al (2016) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer-extensive surgery to be used with discretion based on 3-year local recurrence results: a registry-based, observational national cohort study. Ann Surg 263:516–521