Outpatient Non‐operative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Non‐inferiority Study

Author:

Ceresoli Marco1ORCID,Fumagalli Chiara1,Fugazzola Paola2,Zanini Nicola3,Magnone Stefano4,Ravasi Michela1,Bonalumi Jacopo1,Morezzi Daniele3,Bova Raffaele3,Sargenti Benedetta2,Schiavone Luca2,Lucianetti Alessandro4,Catena Fausto3,Ansaloni Luca2,Braga Marco1

Affiliation:

1. General and Emergency Surgery School of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano‐Bicocca Via Pergolesi 33 20900 Monza Italy

2. General and Emergency Surgery Fondazione IRCCS San Matteo Pavia Italy

3. General and Emergency Surgery Bufalini Hospital Cesena Italy

4. General and Emergency Surgery ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo Italy

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionNon‐operative management (NOM) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a well‐established alternative to upfront surgery. The administration of intravenous broad‐spectrum antibiotics is usually performed in hospital, and only one study described outpatient NOM. The aim of this multicentre retrospective non‐inferiority study was to evaluate both safety and non‐inferiority of outpatient compared to inpatient NOM in uncomplicated acute appendicitis.MethodsThe study included 668 consecutive patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Patients were treated according to the surgeon’s preference: 364 upfront appendectomy, 157 inpatient NOM (inNOM), and 147 outpatient NOM (outNOM). The primary endpoint was the 30‐day appendectomy rate, with a non‐inferiority limit of 5%. Secondary endpoints were negative appendectomy rate, 30‐day unplanned emergency department (ED) visits, and length of stay.Results30‐day appendectomies were 16 (10.9%) in the outNOM group and 23 (14.6%) in the inNOM group (p = 0.327). OutNOM was non‐inferior to inNOM with a risk difference of—3.80% 97.5% CI (− 12.57; 4.97). No difference was found between inNOM and outNOM groups for the number of complicated appendicitis (3 vs. 5) and negative appendectomy (1 vs. 0). Twenty‐six (17.7%) outNOM patients required an unplanned ED visit after a median of 1 (1–4) days. In the outNOM group, the mean cumulative in‐hospital stay was 0.89 (1.94) days compared with 3.94 (2.17) days in the inNOM group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsOutpatient NOM was non‐inferior to inpatient NOM with regard to the 30‐day appendectomy rate, while a shorter hospital stay was found in the outNOM group. Further, studies are required to confirm these findings.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3