Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Wound Classification is Prognostic of 30‐Day Readmission Following Surgery

Author:

Yin Victoria1ORCID,Cobb J. Perren2,Wightman Sean C.3,Atay Scott M.3,Harano Takashi3,Kim Anthony W.3

Affiliation:

1. Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California 1975 Zonal Avenue 90033 Los Angeles CA USA

2. Departments of Surgery & Anesthesiology Critical Care Institute Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California 1520 San Pablo Street, Suite 4300 90033 Los Angeles CA USA

3. Division of Thoracic Surgery Department of Surgery Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California 1510 San Pablo Street, Suite 514 90033 Los Angeles CA USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe goal of this study was to investigate factors associated with 30‐day readmission in a multivariate model, including the CDC wound classes “clean,” “clean/contaminated,” “contaminated,” and “dirty/infected.”MethodsThe 2017–2020 American College of Surgeons‐National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS‐NSQIP) database was queried for all patients undergoing total hip replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, pneumonectomy, and colectomies. ACS‐defined wound classes were concordant with CDC definitions. Multivariate linear mixed regression was used to determine risk factors for readmission while adjusting for type of surgery as a random intercept.Results477,964 cases were identified, with 38,734 (8.1%) patients having experienced readmission within 30 days of surgery. There were 181,243 (37.9%) cases classified as wound class “clean”, 215,729 (45.1%) cases classified as “clean/contaminated”, 40,684 cases (8.5%) classified as “contaminated”, and 40,308 (8.4%) cases classified as “dirty/infected”. In the multivariate generalized mixed linear model adjusting for type of surgery, sex, body mass index, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, presence of comorbidity, length of stay, urgency of surgery, and discharge destination, “clean/contaminated” (p < .001), “contaminated” (p < .001), and “dirty/infected” (p < .001) wound classes (when compared to “clean”) were significantly associated with 30‐day readmission. Organ/space surgical site infection and sepsis were among the most common reasons for readmission in all wound classes.ConclusionsWound classification was strongly prognostic for readmission in multivariable models, suggesting that it may serve as a marker of readmissions. Surgical procedures that are “non‐clean” are at significantly greater risk for 30‐day readmission. Readmissions may be due to infectious complications; optimizing antibiotic use or source control to prevent readmission are areas of future study.

Funder

University of Southern California

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3