Comparison between biparietal bipolar and uniparietal bipolar radio frequency ablation techniques in a simultaneous procedural setting

Author:

Matteucci FrancescoORCID,Maesen Bart,De Asmundis Carlo,Bidar Elham,Parise Gianmarco,Maessen Jos G.,La Meir Mark,Gelsomino Sandro

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To make an in vitro evaluation of the lesion size and depth produced in two different sets of radio frequency energy bipolar delivery: simultaneous biparietal bipolar (SBB) and simultaneous uniparietal bipolar (SUB). Methods Two separate prototypes have been built for our purpose: one to be used in SBB mode and the other to be used SUB mode. Forty left atrium samples were taken from the hearts of freshly slaughtered pigs. They were ablated into a simulator ABLABOX, where blood flow, temperature, and contact force were controlled. After being sliced into a cryotome, the samples were digitalized by a flatbed scanner, and the images were analyzed by a computer morphometric software. Results Transmural lesions were achieved in 18/20 samples (90%) in SBB, while SUB showed transmurality in 9/20 samples (45%). Overall maximum diameter (DMAX) resulted larger in SUB than in SBB (2.43 ± 0.30 mm, 1.62 ± 0.14 mm, respectively; p < 0.05): Moreover, maximum epicardial and endocardial diameters (DEPI and DENDO, respectively) were wider in SUB group than SBB group (2.28 ± 0.30 mm, 2.26 ± 0.40 and 1.60 ± 0.14 mm, 1.59 ± 0.15 mm, respectively; p < 0.05). We observed the same tendency in lesion depth: The total area and volume (ATOT and VTOT) were broader in SUB group than in SBB one (581.01 ± 65.38 mm/mm2, 58.10 ± 6.53 mm/mm3 and 521.97 ± 73.05 mm/mm2, 52.19 ± 7.30 mm/mm3. respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusions In contrast with the smaller lesion sizes, the biparietal bipolar group showed a higher transmurality rate. These findings may suggest a better drive of the energy flow when compared with SUB lesions.

Funder

Maastricht University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3