Influence of diagram layout and scrolling on understandability of BPMN processes: an eye tracking experiment with BPMN diagrams

Author:

Lübke DanielORCID,Ahrens Maike,Schneider Kurt

Abstract

AbstractBusiness process modeling is an important activity for developing software systems—especially within digitization projects and when realizing digital business models. Specifying requirements and building executable workflows is often done by using BPMN 2.0 process models. Although there are several style guides available for BPMN, e.g., by Silver and Richard (BPMN method and style, vol 2, Cody-Cassidy Press, Aptos, 2009), there has not been much empirical research done into the consequences of the diagram layout. In particular, layouts that require scrolling have not been investigated yet. The aim of this research is to establish layout guidelines for business process modeling that help business process modelers to create more understandable business process diagrams. For establishing benefits and penalties of different layouts, a controlled eye tracking experiment was conducted, in which data of 21 professional software developers was used. Our results show that horizontal layouts are less demanding and that as many diagram elements as possible should be put on the initially visible screen area because such diagram elements are viewed more often and longer. Additionally, diagram elements related to the reader’s task are read more often than those not relevant to the task. BPMN modelers should favor a horizontal layout and use a more complex snake or multi-line layout whenever the diagrams are too large to fit on one page in order to support BPMN model comprehension.

Funder

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Communication,Information Systems

Reference68 articles.

1. Ahrens M, Schneider K, Kiesling S (2016) How do we read specifications? experiences from an eye tracking study. In: International working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality. Springer, pp 301–317

2. Basili VR (1993) Applying the goal/question/metric paradigm in the experience factory. Software quality assurance and measurement: a worldwide perspective, pp 21–44

3. Berli W, Lübke D, Möckli W (2014) Terravis - large scale business process integration between public and private partners. In: Plödereder E, Grunske L, Schneider E, Ull D (eds) Lecture notes in informatics (LNI), proceedings INFORMATIK 2014, vol P-232. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., pp 1075–1090

4. Bernstein V, Soffer P (2015) Advanced information systems engineering workshops: CAiSE 2015 international workshops, Stockholm, Sweden, June 8-9, 2015, Proceedings, chap. How does it look? Exploring meaningful layout features of process models. Springer, Cham, pp 81–86

5. Birchler A, Bosshart E, Märki M, Opitz P, Pauli J, Rigert B, Sandoz Y, Schaffroth M, Spöcker N, Tanner C, Walser K, Widmer T (2014) eCH-0158 BPMN-Modellierungskonventionen für die öffentliche Verwaltung. https://www.ech.ch/dokument/fb5725cb-813f-47dc-8283-c04f9311a5b8

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3