Abstract
AbstractVarious cranioplasty techniques exist for the reconstruction of cranial bone defects. Patient-specific implants can be produced in-house using a recently developed 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty technique. However, the resulting cosmetic outcomes from the patient’s perspective are underreported. With our case series, we aim to present the clinical outcome, morbidity rate, patient-reported cosmetic results, and cost-effectiveness of patient-specific3D printer-assisted cranioplasty technique. This is a consecutive retrospective case series of adult patients undergoing cranioplasty using the patient-specific 3D printer-assisted technique. As primary endpoint, the functional outcome based on modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge and follow-up was assessed. A prospective telephone survey was conducted to collect and provide patient-reported outcomes. Thirty-one patients underwent patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty, mostly to reconstruct frontotemporoparietal (61.3%) and frontotemporal defects with orbital involvement (19.4%). Good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at discharge and during the last follow-up was achieved in 54.8% (n = 17) and 58.1% (n = 18) patients. Overall, the rate of clinically relevant surgery-related complications was 35.5% (n = 11). Postoperative epidural hematoma/collection (16.1%) and infections (12.9%) were the most frequent complications. Permanent morbidity occurred in one patient (3.2%) with postoperative acute ipsilateral vision loss after frontotemporal cranioplasty with orbital involvement. No surgery-related mortality occurred. The mean patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction score was 7.8 ± 1.5, with 80% of patients reporting satisfying or very satisfying cosmetic results. No significant differences were seen between the different defect localization regarding the cosmetic outcome. The mean manufacturing costs of a patient-specific 3D printer-assisted implant ranged from 748 to 1129 USD. Based on our case series, patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty is cost-effective and leads to satisfying cosmetic results, especially in large defects and/or defects with complex geometry.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery
Reference26 articles.
1. Feroze AH, Walmsley GG, Choudhri O, Lorenz HP, Grant GA, Edwards MSB (2015) Evolution of cranioplasty techniques in neurosurgery: historical review, pediatric considerations, and current trends. J Neurosurg 123(4):1098–1107
2. Msallem B, Beiglboeck F, Honigmann P, Jaquiéry C, Thieringer F (2017) Craniofacial reconstruction by a cost-efficient template-based process using 3D printing. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(11):1–5
3. Iaccarino C, Kolias A, Adelson PD et al (2021) Consensus statement from the international consensus meeting on post-traumatic cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163(2):423–440
4. Satapathy D, Nadeem M, Shukla DP, Prabhuraj AR, Devi BI (2019) Cosmetic outcome of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy—an overlooked aspect. World Neurosurg 129:e81–e86
5. Yamaguchi K, Itagaki K (2002) Measurement of high temperature heat content of silicon by drop calorimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim 69(3):1059–1066
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献