Regorafenib for recurrent high-grade glioma: a unicentric retrospective analysis of feasibility, efficacy, and toxicity
-
Published:2022-06-20
Issue:5
Volume:45
Page:3201-3208
-
ISSN:1437-2320
-
Container-title:Neurosurgical Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Neurosurg Rev
Author:
Treiber HannesORCID, von der Brelie Christian, Malinova Vesna, Mielke Dorothee, Rohde Veit, Chapuy Claudia Ilse
Abstract
AbstractWe describe here 11 consecutive patients with recurrence of high-grade glioma treated with regorafenib at our university medical center. The majority of patients had MGMT promoter methylation (9/11 cases). Regorafenib was given as 2nd line systemic treatment in 6/11 patients and 3rd or higher line treatment in 5/11 patients. The median number of applied cycles was 2 with dosage reductions in 5/11. Response to treatment was observed in 4/11 (PR in 1/11, and SD in 3/11). Median overall survival for the cohort was 16.1 months, median progression-free survival 9.0 months, and median time to treatment failure 3.3 months. Side effects of any CTCAE grade were noted in all patients, hereby 6/11 with CTCAE °III-IV reactions. High-grade side effects were of dermatologic, cardiovascular, and hematologic nature. A mean treatment delay of 57.5 days (range 23–119) was noted between tumor board recommendation and treatment initiation due to the application process for off-label use in this indication. In conclusion, treatment with regorafenib in relapsed high-grade glioma is a feasible treatment option but has to be considered carefully due to the significant side effect profile.
Funder
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery
Reference21 articles.
1. Batchelor TT, Mulholland P, Neyns B, Nabors LB, Campone M, Wick A, Mason W, Mikkelsen T, Phuphanich S, Ashby LS, DeGroot J, Gattamaneni R, Cher L, Rosenthal M, Payer F, Jürgensmeier JM, Jain RK, Sorensen AG, Xu J, Liu Q, van den Bent M (2013) Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 31:3212–3218. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.47.2464 2. Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, Granito A, Huang Y-H, Bodoky G, Pracht M, Yokosuka O, Rosmorduc O, Breder V, Gerolami R, Masi G, Ross PJ, Song T, Bronowicki J-P, Ollivier-Hourmand I, Kudo M, Cheng A-L, Llovet JM, Finn RS, LeBerre M-A, Baumhauer A, Meinhardt G, Han G, RESORCE Investigators (2017) Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32453-9 3. Detti B, Scoccianti S, Lucidi S, Maragna V, Teriaca MA, Ganovelli M, Desideri I, Lorenzetti V, Scoccimarro E, Greto D, Livi L (2021) Regorafenib in glioblastoma recurrence: a case report. Cancer Treat Res Commun 26:100263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100263 4. George S, Wang Q, Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Zhu M, Butrynski JE, Morgan JA, Wagner AJ, Choy E, Tap WD, Yap JT, Van den Abbeele AD, Manola JB, Solomon SM, Fletcher JA, von Mehren M, Demetri GD (2012) Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GI stromal tumor after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 30:2401–2407. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9394 5. Global Coalition for Adaptive Research (2021) GBM AGILE: Global Adaptive Trial Master Protocol: an international, seamless phase II/III response adaptive randomization platform trial designed to evaluate multiple regimens in newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03970447
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|