The effects of dabrafenib and/or trametinib treatment in Braf V600-mutant glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of dabrafenib and/or trametinib therapy in BRAF v600-mutant glioma treatment. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from inception to Sep 2023. Inclusion criteria were designed based on the PICO principle to select relevant articles. Search keywords included ‘dabrafenib’, ‘trametinib’, ‘glioma’ and other related keywords. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), and death events. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used to assess the methodological quality. Stata 14.0 was selected to perform the Cochrane Q and I2 statistics to test the heterogeneity among all studies. As for publication bias assessment and sensitivity analysis, the funnel plot, Egger regression test, Begg test, and trim and fill method were selected. Including 8 studies for meta-analysis. The pooled results of the single-arm trials showed that the median PFS and median OS after treatment were 6.10 months and 22.73 months, respectively. Notably, this study found a high incidence of AEs and death events of 50% and 43% after treatment. All the above findings were statistically significant. Also, this study statistically supported the advantage of disease response improvement after the combination therapy in BRAF v600-mutant glioma patients, which were shown as a pooled rate of PR (30%), a pooled rate of CR (18%), and a pooled rate of ORR (39%). And the AE rate was lower in the monotherapy group (AE: 25%) than in the combination treatment group (AE: 60%). Sensitivity analysis indicated that all the results were robust. Based on current literature outcomes, dabrafenib and/or trametinib may lead to the median PFS of 6.10 months and median OS as 22.73 months for BRAF v600-mutant glioma patients, and the safety of monotherapy is better than that of combination therapy. This conclusion needs to be treated with caution and further verified.