Trapped fourth ventricle: to stent, shunt, or fenestrate—a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Abstract

AbstractTrapped or isolated fourth ventricle (TFV) is a rare but critical neurosurgical condition, mostly occurring in pediatric patients, caused by a blockage of the in- and outlets of the fourth ventricle. The purpose of this study is to review all available data on the treatment options of TFV and to compare their safety, efficacy, and durability. MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to September 13, 2022, for prospective or retrospective cohorts, case-control studies, case series or case reports, reporting detailing outcomes of TFV patients, treated with an endoscopic-, microsurgical-, shunt placement,- or hybrid approaches to TFV. All authors were contacted to provide individual patient data. Eighty-seven articles (314 patients) were included in the individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD) and 9 (151 patients) in the cohort meta-analysis. The IPD revealed that primary endoscopic (aOR 0.21; [95% CI 0.08–0.57]) and microsurgical interventions (aOR 0.21; [95% CI 0.05–0.82]) were associated with a significantly lower revision rate, compared to shunt placement, when adjusted for confounders. Endoscopy was also associated with a significantly higher rate of clinical improvement (aOR 4.56; [95% CI 1.2–18]). The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in revision rate between the endoscopic (0.33 [95% CI 0.0–0.52]) and shunt group (0.44 [95% CI 0.0–1.0]). Endoscopy should be considered as the first-line treatment of TFV due to its superior efficacy, durability, and similar safety, compared to shunt placement and its minimally invasive nature. Microsurgery should be considered as a second treatment option, due to its similar clinical outcomes and revision rate as endoscopy, but it is more invasive in nature.