Usefulness of time-resolved MR angiography in spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF)—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

AbstractSpinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) constitute the most common type of spinal vascular malformations. Their diagnosis requires spinal digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which is time-consuming, requires catheterizing many vessels, and exposes patient to a high radiation and contrast doses. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of time-resolved MR angiography (TR–MRA) in SDAVF diagnosis. We performed a systematic review of the PubMed and EMBASE databases followed by a meta-analysis. TR–MRA was an index test, and spinal DSA was a reference. Of the initial 324 records, we included 4 studies describing 71 patients with SDAVFs. In 42 cases, TR–MRA was true positive, and in 21 cases, it was true negative. We found 7 false-positive cases and 1 false negative. TR–MRA allowed for shunt level identification in 39 cases. Of these, the predicted level was correct in 23 cases (59%), to within 1 level in 38 cases (97.4%) and to within 2 levels in 39 cases (100%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 72.73 (95% CI [10.30; 513.35]), z = 4.30, p value < 0.0001. The pooled sensitivity was 0.98 (95% CI [0.64; 1.00]), and the pooled specificity was 0.79 (95% CI [0.10; 0.99]). The AUC of the SROC curve was 0.9. TR–MRA may serve as a preliminary study to detect SDAVFs and localize the shunt level with sensitivity and specificity as high as 98% and 79%, respectively. Unless the TR–MRA result is unequivocal, it should be followed by a limited spinal DSA.