1. Baisch, F. J., Hahn, G., Šipinková, I., Beer, M., andHellige, G. (1995): ‘Comparison of electrode belts with ‘spot’ electrodes in electrical impedance tomography’. Proc. Concerted Action on Impedance Tomography (CAIT) Workshop on The Electrode-Skin Interface in Electrical Impedance Tomography, Belfast, UK,Innov. Techno. Bio. Med.,16, (2), pp. 119–125
2. Barber, D. C., Brown, B. H., andFreeston, I. L. (1983): ‘Imaging spatial distributions of resistivity using applied potential tomography’,Electron Lett.,19, pp. 933–935
3. Bard, A. J. andFaulkner, L. R. (1980): ‘Electrochemical methods’ (John Wiley)
4. Boone, K., andHolder, D. S. (1995a): ‘Assessment of noise and drift artefacts in electrical impedance tomography measurements using the Sheffield Mark 1 system’, Proc. Concerted Action on Impedance Tomography (CAIT) Workshop on The Electrode-Skin Interface in Electrical Impedance Tomography, Belfast, UK,Innov. Technol. Biol. Med.,16, (2), pp. 49–60
5. Boone, K., andHolder, D. S. (1995b): ‘A model of the effect of variations in contact and skin impedance on electrical impedance tomography measurement artefacts’. Proc. Concerted Action on Impedance Tomography (CAIT) Workshop on The Electrode-Skin Interface in Electrical Impedance Tomography, Belfast, UK,Innov. Techno., Bio. Med.,16, (2), pp. 61–70