‘Is this a Time of Beautiful Chaos?’: Reflecting on International Feminist Legal Methods

Author:

Bird FayeORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis article considers how Margaret Jane Radin’s theory of the feminist double bind can bring conceptual clarity to the difficulties feminisms face in engaging with political and legal institutions of global governance. I draw on her theory to reinitiate a conversation on ideal and nonideal theory, in order to answer the call of key proponents in international legal feminism to reevaluate methodologies in critiquing mainstream institutions. By providing an account of how to navigate the double bind, this article brings conceptual clarity to the tension between resistance and compliance that has been argued to lie at the heart of the feminist project in international law. I demonstrate how this theoretical framework can foster greater pluralist perspectives in feminist engagement of ideal theories to temper the deradicalising and conservative risk of navigating feasibility constrained nonideal strategies.

Funder

Arts and Humanities Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Gender Studies

Reference77 articles.

1. Bianchi, Andrea. 2016. International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Charlesworth, Hilary. (2011) 2014. Talking to Ourselves? Feminist Scholarship in International Law. In Feminist Perspectives on Contemporary International Law: Between Resistance and Compliance?, ed. Sari Kouvo and Zoe Pearson, 17–32. Oxford: Oñati International Series in Law and Society, Hart Publishing.

3. Charlesworth, Hilary, and Christine Chinkin. 2000. The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

4. Charlesworth, Hilary, Christine Chinkin, and Shelley Wright. 1991. Feminist Approaches to International Law. American Journal of International Law 85 (4): 613–645.

5. Charlesworth, Hilary, Gina Heathcote, and Emily Jones. 2019. Feminist Scholarship on International Law in the 1990s and Today: An Inter-Generational Conversation. Feminist Legal Studies 27 (1): 79–93.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3