Abstract
AbstractAccidental and intentional disruptive events affecting Critical Infrastructure (CI) systems dramatically increase on a global scale and put pressure on governments and CI operators to further improve technical and organizational capacities for securing the continuity of service. Experts in the field call for collaborative approaches to manage CI interdependencies and mitigate domino effects, which amplify the impact of disruptions over space, time and social functions. This paper presents an integrated framework for the classification, assessment and selection of Good Practices (GPs) in the Critical Infrastructure Resilience domain—‘CRAFTER’, from the perspective of collaborative Emergency Management (EM) capability building. The GPs mainly come from local and national level actions and programs, emphasizing the importance of fostering collaborative processes among stakeholders. The study identified 53 GPs through a systematic analysis of available scientific literature and research projects in the CI domain, which were used in the development of the CRAFTER framework. The framework was refined and validated through a questionnaire administered to CI experts, as a way to integrate theory-based and practitioner-based knowledge. The GPs were then classified and assessed according to their intended application context, the activities and functionalities covered, and the EM capabilities they support. The CRAFTER framework enables the assessment and benchmarking of GPs showing their strengths and weaknesses when used to build EM capabilities. It also supports practitioners in selecting a smallest effective bundle of GPS under different institutional and operational contexts, making sure that all the EM phases and capabilities are adequately covered.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science
Reference69 articles.
1. Adini B, Cohen O, Eide AW et al (2017) Striving to be resilient : What concepts, approaches and practices should be incorporated in resilience management guidelines? Technol Forecast Soc Change 121:39–49
2. Adini B, Goldberg A, Cohen R et al (2012) Evidence-based support for the all-hazards approach to emergency preparedness. Isr J Health Policy Res 1:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-1-40
3. Alberto Ceriani (2011) Piano regionale per la protezione delle infrastrutture critiche (PIC). https://www.regione.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/d8fca160-429a-4169-801f-73c08dcf5274/Sintesi_PIC_2011.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-d8fca160-429a-4169-801f-73c08dcf5274-lDlpDbP. Accessed 8 Mar 2021
4. All Hazards Consortium (2020) Working Groups AHC. https://www.ahcusa.org/working-groups-overiew.html. Accessed 24 Aug 2021
5. Alsubaie A, Khaled A, José M (2015) Resilience assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure. International conference on critical information infrastructures security. Springer, Cham, pp 43–55
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献