Author:
Berg Geoffrey A.,Sonecki P.,Berg R. B. S.,MacArthur K. J. D.
Reference18 articles.
1. Akar AR, Szafranek A, Alexiou C, Janas R, Jasinski MJ, Swanevelder J, Sosnowski AW (2002) Use of stentless xenografts in the aortic position: determinants of early and late outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 74:1450–1457, discussion 1457–1458
2. Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, Rao V, Scully HE, Feindel CM, David TE (2005) Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 80:2180–2185
3. Chambers J, Rimington H, Rajani R, Hodson F, Blauth C (2004) Hemodynamic performance on exercise: comparison of a stentless and stented biological aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 13:729–733
4. Chambers JB, Rimington HM, Hodson F, Rajani R, Blauth CI (2006) The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:878–872
5. Dellgren G, Eriksson MJ, Brodin LA, Radegran K (2002) Eleven years’ experience with the Biocor stentless aortic bioprosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic follow-up with long-term relative survival rate. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22:912–921