Patterns of tolerance: how interaction culture and community relations explain political tolerance (and intolerance) in the American libertarian movement

Author:

Marom OdedORCID

Abstract

AbstractExisting explanations of political intolerance and partisanship highlight how individuals’ ideological commitments and the homogeneity of their political environments foster intolerance toward other political groups. This article argues that cultural, interactional conditions play a crucial role in how personal and environmental factors work – or do not work – in local groups. Based on a four-year ethnographic study and 12 focus group discussions with two culturally distinct civic associations of American libertarians, I show how groups’ varying patterns of interaction, or “styles,” establish distinct cultural settings, in which different attitudes and behaviors seem sensible and appropriate, particularly regarding other political groups. Thus, when libertarian groups established a “community style” of interaction, viewing the relationship among members in terms of friendship and community bonds, they also opened their social activities to non-libertarians, collaborated with them in political projects, and viewed politics as a matter of advancing shared interests with people from other political groups. Comparisons across and within field sites show how this relationship between style and political tolerance works in different libertarian groups and different social environments. These findings highlight the role of local factors in explaining variations in groups’ levels of political tolerance and present a key mechanism—centered on interaction patterns—to supplement existing analyses of the relationship between political intolerance and changing forms of civic organizing in the US.

Funder

University of Southern California

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. Baiocchi, G., Bennett, E. A., Cordner, A., & Klein, P., and Stephanie Savell (2014). The Civic Imagination: Making a difference in American Political Life. Paradigm.

2. Berger, B. M. (1981). The survival of a counterculture. University of California Press.

3. Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1967). The Social Construction of reality: A Treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Open Road Media.

4. Bishop, B., & Cushing, R. G. (2009). The big sort: Why the clustering of Likeminded America is tearing us apart. Houghton Mifflin Company.

5. Braunstein, R. (2017). Prophets and patriots: Faith in democracy across the political divide. University of California Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3