Abstract
AbstractThe main aim of this article is to start a discussion of social pattern, a term that is commonly used in sociology but not specified or defined. The key question can be phrased as follows: Is it possible to transform the notion of social pattern from its current status in sociology as a proto-concept into a fully worked out concept? And if so, how can this be done? To provide material for the discussion we begin by introducing a few different types of patterns that are currently being used (patterns in nature, cultural patterns, statistical patterns, and computationally generated patterns). This is followed by a suggestion for what a strictly sociological concept of social pattern may look like. A useful and theoretically solid concept of social pattern can in our view be constructed by basing it on Weber’s concept of social action. This means that both the behavior of the actors and the meaning these invest their behavior with must be taken into account. The article ends with a brief discussion of how to use the concept of social patterns in an effective way and what may endanger such a use.
Funder
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Myndigheten för Samhällsskydd och Beredskap
Stockholm University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History
Reference94 articles.
1. Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence Analysis: New Methods for Old Ideas. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 93–113.
2. Abbott, A. (2016). Processual Sociology. University of Chicago Press.
3. Anderson, Chris. (2008). The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Theory Obsolete. Wired Magazine, June 23. Downloaded on June 15, 2020: https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
4. Arendt, H. (1978). The Life of the Mind. Harcourt Inc.
5. Ball, P. (2009). Nature’s Patterns: A Tapestry in Three Parts. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献