Abstract
AbstractThis paper investigates the intersection of cognitive sciences and social network theory and its counterpart, the complexity sciences, aiming to shed light on the compatibility and potential integration of these frameworks into institutional theory. Institutional scholars have for long selectively adopted notions linked with the cognitive sciences and complexity sciences, such as the notion of path dependence, without exploring the broader implications of systematically integrating such perspectives into institutionalism. This paper aims to advance such a comprehensive theoretical integration, by investigating the effective combination of these approaches and their significant implications. It shows how the complexity sciences contribute to dissolving the barriers between the cognitive and social realms and illustrates how this impacts notions of human agency and reflexivity. Theoretical integration also involves acknowledging considerable diversity in individual human agency, which in turn prompts a reconsideration of how notions of institutional stability, change, diffusion and adaptation are understood. Furthermore, the paper addresses the epistemological challenge presented by the complexity sciences, before it highlights the general relevance of institutional theory in analyzing complex social phenomena. Finally, the paper explores implications for research methodology, proposing that a fusion of institutional theory and the complexity sciences provides a metatheoretical framework for assessing the contextual suitability of different theoretical and methodological approaches.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference79 articles.
1. Abbott, A. (1988). Transcending General Linear reality [research-article]. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.2307/202114
2. Applebaum, A. (2024). Autocracy, Inc: The dictators who want to run the World. Allen Lane.
3. Arthur, W. B. (2021). Foundations of complexity economics. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00273-3
4. Aspinwall, M. D., & Schneider, G. (2000). Same menu, separate tables: The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration. European Journal of Political Research, 38(1), 1–36.
5. Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. (2000). Harnessing complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific Frontier. Basic books.