Abstract
AbstractOfficial documents in several educational systems reflect the importance of integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) and consider project-based learning (PBL) as a way of integrating such disciplines in the classroom. Although STEAM-PBL has been characterized and evaluated in different ways, its impact on school mathematics teaching remains unclear. Mathematics is recognized as the fundamental basis of other disciplines; however, many students still perceive it as a difficult subject and abandon it. To analyze STEAM-PBL classroom implementation from a school mathematics standpoint, we examined 41 classroom experiences from 11 Spanish secondary education teachers (five in-field mathematics teachers), who participated in a STEAM training program for more than 4 years. To frame this study, Thibaut et al.’s (J STEM Educ 3(1):02, 2018) and Schoenfeld’s (Educ Res 43(8):404–412, 2014) characterizations of well-designed and implemented projects, respectively, were employed. The results showed that in-field mathematics teachers avoided transdisciplinary projects in which school mathematics is difficult to address, while out-of-field teachers tended to overlook the mathematics in interdisciplinary projects. Unlike out-of-field teachers, mathematics teachers often eluded design-based learning processes for deeply exploiting school mathematics. The latter teachers promoted high cognitive demands and positive perceptions about mathematics in projects where formative environments were generated through discussion and a meaningful feedback loop.
Funder
Erasmus+
Johannes Kepler University Linz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference58 articles.
1. Akgun, O. E. (2013). Technology in STEM project-based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning. An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 65–75). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
2. Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & de Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9341-0
3. Berardi, E. Á., & Corica, A. R. (2021). ABP en la escuela secundaria: análisis de la gestión de un proyecto sobre el crecimiento de plantas y sus vínculos con la matemática. Épsilon, 106, 7–22.
4. Blanco, T. F., Piqueras, M. G., Diego-Mantecón, J. M., & Ortiz-Laso, Z. (2019). Modelización matemática de la evolución de dos reactivos químicos. Épsilon, 101, 147–155.
5. Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: a contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6–8.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献