Author:
Foley Gregory D.,Budhathoki Deependra,Thapa Amrit B.,Aryal Harman P.
Abstract
AbstractA tertiary course in Quantitative Reasoning (QR) has the potential to develop key practical and intellectual skills for citizenship, such as critical thinking, problem solving, quantitative literacy, and oral and written communication. In this article, we present research conducted on four instructors of such a QR course for students enrolled in a wide variety of nonscience degree programs at a university in the United States. The course used a student-inquiry approach to proportional reasoning, probability, statistical reasoning, and mathematical modeling. The findings are framed by a 5 C model of QR, which entails Critical thinking to link real-world Contexts to mathematical Concepts supported by student Collaboration and QR Competencies. The research addressed the questions of how university instructors support student development of the skills needed for critical citizenship and how this support relates to the 5 C model. We found that three of the four instructors viewed critical thinking as a central goal of the QR course and as supporting citizenship education. All four engaged students in tasks designed to develop a combination of skills associated citizenship, including critical thinking, self-questioning, collaboration, and communication. The discussion addresses such issues as the course’s merits and challenges, student engagement, the relative importance of the five Cs, the importance of instructional autonomy, and recommendations for related professional development and future research.
Funder
Ohio University
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference48 articles.
1. Alhammouri, A. M. (2018). Professional development in mathematical modeling: Teacher engagement, teacher knowledge, and classroom implementation (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University). http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1527243404147734.
2. American Association of Colleges and Universities (2009). Quantitative literacy VALUE rubric. https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-quantitative-literacy.
3. American Association of Colleges and Universities (2020). Overview of the Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education (VALUE) initiative. https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value.
4. American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (2018). IMPACT: Improving mathematical PROWESS and college teaching. https://cdn.ymaws.com/amatyc.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/impact/impact_links.pdf.
5. Boersma, S., Diefenderfer, C., Dingman, S. W., & Madison, B. L. (2011). Quantitative reasoning in the Contemporary World, 3: Assessing student learning. Numeracy, 4(2), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.4.2.8
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献