Instructor perspectives on quantitative reasoning for critical citizenship

Author:

Foley Gregory D.,Budhathoki Deependra,Thapa Amrit B.,Aryal Harman P.

Abstract

AbstractA tertiary course in Quantitative Reasoning (QR) has the potential to develop key practical and intellectual skills for citizenship, such as critical thinking, problem solving, quantitative literacy, and oral and written communication. In this article, we present research conducted on four instructors of such a QR course for students enrolled in a wide variety of nonscience degree programs at a university in the United States. The course used a student-inquiry approach to proportional reasoning, probability, statistical reasoning, and mathematical modeling. The findings are framed by a 5 C model of QR, which entails Critical thinking to link real-world Contexts to mathematical Concepts supported by student Collaboration and QR Competencies. The research addressed the questions of how university instructors support student development of the skills needed for critical citizenship and how this support relates to the 5 C model. We found that three of the four instructors viewed critical thinking as a central goal of the QR course and as supporting citizenship education. All four engaged students in tasks designed to develop a combination of skills associated citizenship, including critical thinking, self-questioning, collaboration, and communication. The discussion addresses such issues as the course’s merits and challenges, student engagement, the relative importance of the five Cs, the importance of instructional autonomy, and recommendations for related professional development and future research.

Funder

Ohio University

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Mathematics,Education

Reference48 articles.

1. Alhammouri, A. M. (2018). Professional development in mathematical modeling: Teacher engagement, teacher knowledge, and classroom implementation (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University). http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1527243404147734.

2. American Association of Colleges and Universities (2009). Quantitative literacy VALUE rubric. https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-quantitative-literacy.

3. American Association of Colleges and Universities (2020). Overview of the Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education (VALUE) initiative. https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value.

4. American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (2018). IMPACT: Improving mathematical PROWESS and college teaching. https://cdn.ymaws.com/amatyc.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/impact/impact_links.pdf.

5. Boersma, S., Diefenderfer, C., Dingman, S. W., & Madison, B. L. (2011). Quantitative reasoning in the Contemporary World, 3: Assessing student learning. Numeracy, 4(2), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.4.2.8

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3