Abstract
AbstractAdvocacy of STEM curricular approaches is based on a concern to engage students in authentic disciplinary and interdisciplinary practices in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) disciplines, and the need to promote participation in STEM pathways. The STEM Academy professional learning program was developed to support teachers to engage and motivate students by creating real-world, challenging problems. The initiative involved interdisciplinary teams of secondary STEM teachers attending workshops and working with university experts to design, implement and evaluate STEM curricular experiences. This paper focuses on case studies undertaken in two of the twelve schools involved in the initiative, using interview data from teachers and students, to explore the nature of their programs and their experiences. We investigate key features of these two schools’ approaches, using a conceptual framework for integrated STEM, and explore the challenges and benefits of different features of integrated STEM that promote different dimensions of engagement in learning mathematics. We explore how the framework characteristics can be reframed into four dimensions that promote mathematics engagement in integrated STEM education - design thinking in authentic contexts, content integration, STEM practices and 21st Century skills, and exposure to professional practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference30 articles.
1. Anderson, J., Tytler, R., & Williams, G. (2023). Supporting curriculum innovation in integrated STEM for secondary teachers in Australia. Research in Integrated STEM Education, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/27726673-00101001.
2. Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34, 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2.
3. Baldinger, E., Staats, S., Clarkson, L., Gullickson, E., Norman, F., & Akoto, B. (2020). A review of conceptions of secondary mathematics in integrated STEM education: Returning voice to the silent M. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 67–90). Springer. https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/geILCP7LAXf09g7gouzRZKX?domain=doi.org.
4. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 12(5–6), 23–36.
5. Bybee, R. W. (2018). STEM education: Now more than ever. National Science Teachers Association Press.