Abstract
AbstractAdaptive learning support provided by kindergarten teachers before and after (macro-adaptive learning support) as well as during mathematical learning activities (micro-adaptive learning support) is a cross-cutting concept of teaching quality. Effective adaptive learning support enhances children’s learning. However, providing it is challenging and teachers need professional development (PD) to improve the quality of their support. This study investigates the mediating role of teaching quality between PD programs for kindergarten teachers and the development of children’s mathematical competency. 122 kindergarten teachers and their 825 pupils participated in the study. The teachers were randomly assigned to three groups. Two groups attended PD sessions designed to foster either macro- or micro-adaptive learning support. The third was the materials-only control group. The data was analyzed using a self-developed rating instrument focusing on generic and domain-specific elements of teaching quality related to macro- and micro-adaptive learning support. The multilevel latent change model analysis revealed that the PD programs had positive and significant effects on the teaching quality of kindergarten teachers. A significant positive relationship was also found between micro-adaptive learning support and changes in children’s mathematical competency. However, an indirect effect of teaching quality could not be detected, and the PD programs did not have a total effect on children’s mathematical competency. The study reinforces the importance of PD that specifically targets macro- and micro-adaptive learning support for kindergarten teachers. The mediation between PD and mathematical competency development requires further investigation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Barenthien, J., Oppermann, E., Anders, Y., & Steffensky, M. (2020). Preschool teachers’ learning opportunities in their initial teacher education and in-service professional development– do they have an influence on preschool teachers’ science-specific professional knowledge and motivation? International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 744–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1727586.
2. Brassard, M. R., & Boehm, A. E. (2007). Preschool assessment: Principles and practices. Guilford Press. https://www.routledge.com/Preschool-Assessment-Principles-and-Practices/Brassard-Boehm/p/book/9781606230305.
3. Brunner, E. (2018). Qualität Von Mathematikunterricht: Eine Frage Der Perspektive [The quality of mathematics education: A question of perspective]. J Math Didakt, 39(2), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-017-0122-z.
4. Brunner, E. (2022). Outlook: Context and its consequences. A neglected factor in research on early childhood teachers’ professional skills? In S. Dunekacke, A. Jegodtka, T. Koinzer, K. Eilerts, & L. Jenßen (Eds.), Early Childhood Teachers‘ Professional Competence in Mathematics (Ch.13, pp. 218–240). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003172529-13.
5. Bruns, J. (2014). Adaptive Förderung in Der Elementarpädagogischen Praxis. Eine Empirische Studie Zum Didaktischen Handeln Von Erzieherinnen Und Erziehern Im Bereich Mathematik [Adaptive support in elementary pedagogical practice. An empirical study on the didactic behavior of educators in the field of mathematics]. Waxmann.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献