A comparison of high-throughput plasma NMR protocols for comparative untargeted metabolomics
-
Published:2020-05
Issue:5
Volume:16
Page:
-
ISSN:1573-3882
-
Container-title:Metabolomics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Metabolomics
Author:
Bliziotis Nikolaos G.ORCID, Engelke Udo F. H., Aspers Ruud L. E. G., Engel Jasper, Deinum Jaap, Timmers Henri J. L. M., Wevers Ron A., Kluijtmans Leo A. J.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
When analyzing the human plasma metabolome with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, the Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) experiment is commonly employed for large studies. However, this process can lead to compromised statistical analyses due to residual macromolecule signals. In addition, the utilization of Trimethylsilylpropanoic acid (TSP) as an internal standard often leads to quantification issues, and binning, as a spectral summarization step, can result in features not clearly assignable to metabolites.
Objectives
Our aim was to establish a new complete protocol for large plasma cohorts collected with the purpose of describing the comparative metabolic profile of groups of samples.
Methods
We compared the conventional CPMG approach to a novel procedure that involves diffusion NMR, using the Longitudinal Eddy-Current Delay (LED) experiment, maleic acid (MA) as the quantification reference and peak picking for spectral reduction. This comparison was carried out using the ultrafiltration method as a gold standard in a simple sample classification experiment, with Partial Least Squares–Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and the resulting metabolic signatures for multivariate data analysis. In addition, the quantification capabilities of the method were evaluated.
Results
We found that the LED method applied was able to detect more metabolites than CPMG and suppress macromolecule signals more efficiently. The complete protocol was able to yield PLS-DA models with enhanced classification accuracy as well as a more reliable set of important features than the conventional CPMG approach. Assessment of the quantitative capabilities of the method resulted in good linearity, recovery and agreement with an established amino acid assay for the majority of the metabolites tested. Regarding repeatability, ~ 85% of all peaks had an adequately low coefficient of variation (< 30%) in replicate samples.
Conclusion
Overall, our comparison yielded a high-throughput untargeted plasma NMR protocol for optimized data acquisition and processing that is expected to be a valuable contribution in the field of metabolic biomarker discovery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Clinical Biochemistry,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Reference54 articles.
1. Akoka, S., Barantin, L., & Trierweiler, M. (1999). Concentration measurement by proton NMR using the ERETIC method. Analytical Chemistry, 71, 2554–2557. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac981422i. 2. Albers, M. J., Butler, T. N., Rahwa, I., Bao, N., Keshari, K. R., Swanson, M. G., et al. (2010). Evaluation of the ERETIC method as an improved quantitative reference for 1 H HR-MAS spectroscopy of prostate tissue. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 61, 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21808.Evaluation. 3. Alum, M. F., Shaw, P. A., Sweatman, B. C., Ubhi, B. K., Haselden, J. N., & Connor, S. C. (2008). 4,4-Dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-ammonium trifluoroacetate (DSA), a promising universal internal standard for NMR-based metabolic profiling studies of biofluids, including blood plasma and serum. Metabolomics, 4, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-008-0103-9. 4. Armitage, E. G., Godzien, J., Alonso-Herranz, V., López-Gonzálvez, Á., & Barbas, C. (2015). Missing value imputation strategies for metabolomics data. Electrophoresis, 36, 3050–3060. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201500352. 5. Beckonert, O., Keun, H. C., Ebbels, T. M. D., Bundy, J., Holmes, E., Lindon, J. C., et al. (2007). Metabolic profiling, metabolomic and metabonomic procedures for NMR spectroscopy of urine, plasma, serum and tissue extracts. Nature Protocols, 2, 2692–2703. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.376.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|