Metabonomics study of the effects of single copy mutant KRAS in the presence or absence of WT allele using human HCT116 isogenic cell lines
-
Published:2021-11-25
Issue:12
Volume:17
Page:
-
ISSN:1573-3882
-
Container-title:Metabolomics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Metabolomics
Author:
Varshavi Dorna, Varshavi Dorsa, McCarthy Nicola, Veselkov Kirill, Keun Hector C., Everett Jeremy R.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
KRAS was one of the earliest human oncogenes to be described and is one of the most commonly mutated genes in different human cancers, including colorectal cancer. Despite KRAS mutants being known driver mutations, KRAS has proved difficult to target therapeutically, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying KRAS-driven cellular transformation.
Objectives
To investigate the metabolic signatures associated with single copy mutant KRAS in isogenic human colorectal cancer cells and to determine what metabolic pathways are affected.
Methods
Using NMR-based metabonomics, we compared wildtype (WT)-KRAS and mutant KRAS effects on cancer cell metabolism using metabolic profiling of the parental KRASG13D/+ HCT116 cell line and its isogenic, derivative cell lines KRAS+/– and KRASG13D/–.
Results
Mutation in the KRAS oncogene leads to a general metabolic remodelling to sustain growth and counter stress, including alterations in the metabolism of amino acids and enhanced glutathione biosynthesis. Additionally, we show that KRASG13D/+ and KRASG13D/− cells have a distinct metabolic profile characterized by dysregulation of TCA cycle, up-regulation of glycolysis and glutathione metabolism pathway as well as increased glutamine uptake and acetate utilization.
Conclusions
Our study showed the effect of a single point mutation in one KRAS allele and KRAS allele loss in an isogenic genetic background, hence avoiding confounding genetic factors. Metabolic differences among different KRAS mutations might play a role in their different responses to anticancer treatments and hence could be exploited as novel metabolic vulnerabilities to develop more effective therapies against oncogenic KRAS.
Graphical abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Clinical Biochemistry,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Reference58 articles.
1. Ahn, C. S., & Metallo, C. M. (2015). Mitochondria as biosynthetic factories for cancer proliferation. Cancer & Metabolism, 3(1), 1. 2. Amelio, I., Cutruzzolá, F., Antonov, A., Agostini, M., & Melino, G. (2014). Serine and glycine metabolism in cancer(). Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 39(4), 191–198. 3. Aquilano, K., Baldelli, S., & Ciriolo, M. R. (2014). Glutathione: New roles in redox signaling for an old antioxidant. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 5, 196. 4. Arrick, B. A., & Nathan, C. F. (1984). Glutathione metabolism as a determinant of therapeutic efficacy: A review. Cancer Research, 44(10), 4224. 5. Arrington, A. K., Heinrich, E. L., Lee, W., Duldulao, M., Patel, S., Sanchez, J., Garcia-Aguilar, J., & Kim, J. (2012). Prognostic and predictive roles of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13(10), 12153–12168.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|