Spiritism in Germany: A Resource of Integration for Brazilian Migrants?

Author:

Kurz HelmarORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis account of qualitative anthropological field research in Brazil and Germany explores the importance of translocal Spiritist/Kardecist networks as resources for Brazilian migrants in Germany. It focuses on aspects of integration with the host society and conflicts arising from divergent expectations and habits. It introduces the author’s multi-sited investigation within the DFG-funded research project “Diversification of Mental Health: Therapeutic Spaces of Brazilian Spiritism” (implemented by Prof. Dr. Helene Basu 2015–2018) and elaborates on the approach of “translocal relations” as crucial for the theoretical discussion before introducing relevant literature reviews and original research data. Case studies confirm the supportive functions of Brazilian Spiritist centers in Germany for migrants but also illustrate that they serve integration only to a marginal degree. Brazilians use Spiritist centers as a resource for not having to integrate and instead staying among themselves. Being aware that this habit contradicts adaptation to new environments and serves critical political approaches, a small group of Brazilians and Germans establish contested integrative practices. In conclusion, this contribution discusses conflicts emerging from Brazilian migration to Germany in religious-spiritual contexts and illustrates that integration is a multi-directional task.

Funder

Universität Münster

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference79 articles.

1. Aubrée M, Laplantine F (2009) A Mesa, o Livro e os Espíritos. Gênese, Evolução e Atualidade do Movimento Social Espírita entre França e Brasil. EdUFAL, Maceió

2. Baer HA, Singer M, Susser I (2013) Medical anthropology and the world system. In: Critical perspectives, 3rd edn. Praeger, Santa Barbara

3. Bahia J, Dantas CM (2018) Música, Corporalidade e Recriação Diaspórica no Candomblé na Alemanha. Cienc Soc y Relig 20(28):82–98. https://doi.org/10.20396/csr.v20i28.12391

4. Barnes LL (2011) New geographies of religion and healing. States of the field. Practical Matters 4:1–82

5. Beaudevin C, Pordié L (2016) Diversion and globalization in biomedical technologies. Med Anthropol 35(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2015.1090436

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3