Abstract
AbstractWhile inclusion, participation and victim-centredness have become catchwords in transitional justice discourse, this rhetoric has not necessarily enabled the articulation of more complex identities and experiences, or the pursuit of varied justice claims. To probe this disconnect, this article engages with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Liberia, a mechanism established to reckon with the country’s history of internal armed conflict, and hailed for its involvement of vulnerable, disenfranchised and oft-overlooked groups. The article combines expressive theories of justice with an innovative corpus-based methodology to critically examine how the Commission made visible, defined and construed these actors through its language of inclusion. Results from word frequency, co-occurrence and sentiment analyses illustrate how the Commission foregrounded the plight and rights of women and children, and their participation as a vehicle for emancipation, but simultaneously reproduced universalist and static identities, fixation on sexual violence and child soldier recruitment, and subject positions lacking in positive or political capabilities. This duality points to inherent tensions in the expressive messaging of TJ institutions, and rather locates the transformative potential of their inclusionary language in the strategic openings it affords for victims’ groups, women and youth organizations in their broader trajectories towards justice and change.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology
Reference78 articles.
1. Allen, J. (1999). Balancing justice and social unity: Political theory and the idea of a truth and reconciliation commission. University of Toronto Law Journal, 49(3), 315–354.
2. Amnesty International (2008) Liberia: Towards the final phase of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/AFR34/002/2008/en/ (accessed 15 September 2021).
3. Aptel, C and Ladisch, V. (2011) Through a New Lens: A Child-Sensitive Approach to Transitional Justice, International Affairs. New York and Brussels: International Center for Transitional Justice.
4. Baker, P., et al. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306.
5. Bakiner, O. (2014). Truth commission impact: An assessment of how commissions influence politics and society. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijt025
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献