Abstract
AbstractSelecting appropriate candidates for genetic rescue mostly relies on previous genetic research and monitoring, while ecological and behavioural traits of the remnant and source populations are rarely considered for such conservation measures. Because of their slow recovery, Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx populations in Central and Western Europe have been a repeated target of genetic reinforcements and reintroductions in the past 50 years. Once inhabiting much of south-eastern Europe, the Balkan lynx L. l. balcanicus is now critically endangered and confined to a small population. Long-term isolation has caused loss of genetic diversity and has possibly led to inbreeding depression. Immediate actions need to consider genetic reinforcement to increase the genetic diversity and secure population viability. Here, we compared the Balkan lynx with two neighbouring populations: Dinaric population originating from the Carpathian subspecies (L.l. carpathicus) and Anatolian population of Caucasian subspecies (L.l. dinniki) to determine is better suited source from an ecological standpoint. Main findings suggest that the L.l. carpathicus is ecologically more similar to the L.l. balcanicus and therefore likely better suited for the environment of south-western Balkans on the basis of prey preference (roe deer being the main prey), local prey availability (lower lagomorph and higher ungulate availability) and habitat use (predominant use of the mixed and broadleaved forests). We discuss the contrasting results of genetic and ecological analyses from both the evolutionary and conservation perspective and provide potential solutions that would take into account both aspects to pave the road towards potential genetic rescue of the Balkan lynx.
Funder
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference73 articles.
1. Aksoy N (2009) Flora of Karakiriş Mountain (Seben-Nallıhan). Düzce Univ J for 5:104–125 ([In Turkish])
2. Avgan B, Zimmermann F, Güntert M, Arıkan F, Breitenmoser U (2014) The first density estimation of an isolated Eurasian lynx population in southwest Asia. Wildlife Biol 20:217–221. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00025
3. Bazzicalupo E, Lucena-Perez M, Kleinman-Ruiz D et al (2022) History, demography and genetic status of Balkan and Caucasian Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) populations revealed by genome-wide variation. Divers Distrib 28(1):65–82
4. Belotti E, Weder N, Bufka L, Kaldhusdal A, Küchenhoff H, Seibold H, Woelfing B, Heurich M (2015) Patterns of lynx predation at the interface between protected areas and multi-use landscapes in Central Europe. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138139
5. Breitenmoser U, von Arx M, Bego F, et al (2008) Strategic planning for the conservation of the Balkan Lynx. In: Proceedings of the III Congress of Ecologists of the Republic of Macedonia with International Participation. Macedonian Ecological Society, Struga, FYR Macedonia, pp 242–248
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献