Predicting Mood Based on the Social Context Measured Through the Experience Sampling Method, Digital Phenotyping, and Social Networks
-
Published:2024-01-10
Issue:4
Volume:51
Page:455-475
-
ISSN:0894-587X
-
Container-title:Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Adm Policy Ment Health
Author:
Langener Anna M.ORCID, Bringmann Laura F.ORCID, Kas Martien J.ORCID, Stulp GertORCID
Abstract
AbstractSocial interactions are essential for well-being. Therefore, researchers increasingly attempt to capture an individual's social context to predict well-being, including mood. Different tools are used to measure various aspects of the social context. Digital phenotyping is a commonly used technology to assess a person's social behavior objectively. The experience sampling method (ESM) can capture the subjective perception of specific interactions. Lastly, egocentric networks are often used to measure specific relationship characteristics. These different methods capture different aspects of the social context over different time scales that are related to well-being, and combining them may be necessary to improve the prediction of well-being. Yet, they have rarely been combined in previous research. To address this gap, our study investigates the predictive accuracy of mood based on the social context. We collected intensive within-person data from multiple passive and self-report sources over a 28–day period in a student sample (Participants: N = 11, ESM measures: N = 1313). We trained individualized random forest machine learning models, using different predictors included in each model summarized over different time scales. Our findings revealed that even when combining social interactions data using different methods, predictive accuracy of mood remained low. The average coefficient of determination over all participants was 0.06 for positive and negative affect and ranged from − 0.08 to 0.3, indicating a large amount of variance across people. Furthermore, the optimal set of predictors varied across participants; however, predicting mood using all predictors generally yielded the best predictions. While combining different predictors improved predictive accuracy of mood for most participants, our study highlights the need for further work using larger and more diverse samples to enhance the clinical utility of these predictive modeling approaches.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Abdullah, S., Matthews, M., Frank, E., Doherty, G., Gay, G., & Choudhury, T. (2016). Automatic detection of social rhythms in bipolar disorder. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(3), 538–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv200 2. Asendorpf, J. B., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2020). States and situations, traits and environments. In G. Matthews & P. J. Corr (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 56–68). Cambridge University Press. 3. Asselbergs, J., Ruwaard, J., Ejdys, M., Schrader, N., Sijbrandij, M., & Riper, H. (2016). Mobile phone-based unobtrusive ecological momentary assessment of day-to-day mood: An explorative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(3), e72. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5505 4. Bähr, S., Haas, G.-C., Keusch, F., Kreuter, F., & Trappmann, M. (2022). Missing data and other measurement quality issues in mobile geolocation sensor data. Social Science Computer Review, 40(1), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320944118 5. Benoit, J., Onyeaka, H., Keshavan, M., & Torous, J. (2020). Systematic review of digital phenotyping and machine learning in psychosis spectrum illnesses. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, Publish Ah. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000268
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|