Dose-Response Effects of MittEcho, a Measurement Feedback System, in an Indicated Mental Health Intervention for Children in Municipal and School Services in Norway
-
Published:2024-05-29
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0894-587X
-
Container-title:Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Adm Policy Ment Health
Author:
Haug Ida MariORCID, Neumer Simon-PeterORCID, Handegård Bjørn HelgeORCID, Lisøy CarinaORCID, Rasmussen Lene-Mari P.ORCID, Bania Elisabeth ValmyrORCID, Adolfsen FrodeORCID, Patras JoshuaORCID
Abstract
AbstractIncluding routine client feedback can increase the effectiveness of mental health interventions for children, especially when implemented as intended. Rate of implementation, or dose, of such feedback interventions has been shown to moderate results in some studies. Variation in implementation and use of client feedback may also contribute to the mixed results observed within the feedback literature. This study evaluates dose-response associations of client feedback using a novel Measurement Feedback System (MFS) within an indicated group intervention. The primary aim was to determine whether the rate of MFS implementation predicts symptom reduction in anxiety and depression among school-aged children. The secondary aim was to assess whether the rate of MFS implementation influences children’s satisfaction with the group intervention or their dropout rates. Data were collected via a randomized factorial study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04263558) across 58 primary schools in Norway. Children aged 8 to 12 years (N = 701) participated in a group-based, transdiagnostic intervention targeting elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression. Half of the child groups also received the feedback intervention using the MittEcho MFS. Group leaders (N = 83), recruited locally, facilitated the interventions. The MFS dose was measured using the Implementation Index, which combines the use of MFS by both children and providers (group leaders) into a single dose variable. Results showed no significant additional effect of dose of MFS on change in depression or anxiety scores, on user satisfaction with the intervention or on intervention dropout. The discussion addresses potential reasons for these non-significant findings and implications for MFS implementation in preventive, group-based interventions in school settings.
Funder
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. Alldredge, C., Burlingame, G., Olsen, J., & Van Epps, J. (2020). Outcome questionnaire-45 (OQ-45) progress alert rates in group versus individual treatment: An archival replication. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice, 24(4), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000121. 2. Angold, A., Costello, E. J., Messer, S. C., Pickles, A., Winder, F., & Silver, D. (1995). The development of a Questionnaire for Use in Epidemiological studies of Depression in Children and adolescents. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 5, 237–249. 3. Barber, J., & Resnick, S. G. (2022). Collect, share, Act: A transtheoretical clinical model for doing measurement-based care in mental health treatment. Psychol Serv. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000629. 4. Barkham, M., De Jong, K., Delgadillo, J., & Lutz, W. (2023). Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and feedback: Research Review and recommendations. Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2181114. 5. Bergman, H., Kornør, H., Nikolakopoulou, A., Hanssen-Bauer, K., Soares‐Weiser, K., Tollefsen, T. K., & Bjørndal, A. (2018). Client feedback in psychological therapy for children and adolescents with mental health problems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011729.pub2.
|
|