Factors Associated with Prospective Acceptability and Preferences for Unified Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Treatments and Group Therapy in the Portuguese General Population
-
Published:2024-06-05
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0894-587X
-
Container-title:Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Adm Policy Ment Health
Author:
Pedro Liliana Maria RodriguesORCID, de Oliveira Michael FonsecaORCID, Pereira Marco DanielORCID, da Fonseca Ana DiasORCID, Canavarro Maria CristinaORCID
Abstract
AbstractGroup transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) offers a promising solution for limited mental health access in Portugal. Understanding barriers to patient adherence is crucial for successful implementation. This study aimed to characterize the prospective acceptability and preferences for unified transdiagnostic CBT and group therapy in the Portuguese general population and explore their correlates. A sample of 243 participants (18–88 years old), recruited online, completed an online survey collecting information on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, acceptability of transdiagnostic CBT treatments, specifically of Unified Protocol (UP), acceptability of group therapy, therapeutic format preferences, beliefs about group therapy and help-seeking attitudes. Most participants were receptive to and perceived as useful both unified transdiagnostic CBT and group therapy. Overall, participants presented significantly more favorable attitudes than unfavorable attitudes toward unified transdiagnostic CBT and group therapy (p < .001). Multivariate analyses revealed that (1) favorable attitudes toward transdiagnostic treatments were negatively associated with being employed and positively associated with living in an urban area, and higher efficacy scores; (2) unfavorable attitudes toward transdiagnostic treatments were positively associated with being married/cohabitating and negatively associated with vulnerability scores; (3) being female, living in an urban area, and higher efficacy and myth scores emerged as positive predictors of favorable attitudes toward group therapy; and (4) efficacy and vulnerability scores and help-seeking propensity emerged as negative predictors of unfavorable attitudes toward group therapy. These findings highlight the importance of delineating strategies to increase knowledge and acceptance of unified transdiagnostic CBT and group therapy in the Portuguese population, addressing specific individual characteristics.
Funder
Universidade de Coimbra
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference93 articles.
1. Alang, S. M., & McAlpine, D. D. (2019). Pathways to mental health services and perceptions about the effectiveness of treatment. Society and Mental Health, 9(3), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869318802341. 2. Ametaj, A. A., Wilner Tirpak, J., Cassiello-Robbins, C., Snow, R., Rassaby, M. M., Beer, K., & Sauer-Zavala, S. (2021). A preliminary investigation of provider attitudes toward a transdiagnostic treatment: Outcomes from training workshops with the unified protocol. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 48(4), 668–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01101-7. 3. Andersen, P., Toner, P., Bland, M., & McMillan, D. (2016). Effectiveness of transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety and depression in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 44(6), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465816000229. 4. Barbato, A., Vallarino, M., Rapisarda, F., Lora, A., & de Almeida, J. M. C. (2016). EU compass for action on mental health and well-being. Access to mental health care in Europe. Scientific paper. Funded by the European Union in the frame of the 3rd EU Health Programme (2014–2020). https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-12/ev_20161006_co04_en_0.pdf. 5. Barkowski, S., Schwartze, D., Strauss, B., Burlingame, G. M., & Rosendahl, J. (2020). Efficacy of group psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 30(8), 965–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2020.1729440.
|
|