Factors Associated with Prospective Acceptability and Preferences for Unified Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Treatments and Group Therapy in the Portuguese General Population

Author:

Pedro Liliana Maria RodriguesORCID,de Oliveira Michael FonsecaORCID,Pereira Marco DanielORCID,da Fonseca Ana DiasORCID,Canavarro Maria CristinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractGroup transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) offers a promising solution for limited mental health access in Portugal. Understanding barriers to patient adherence is crucial for successful implementation. This study aimed to characterize the prospective acceptability and preferences for unified transdiagnostic CBT and group therapy in the Portuguese general population and explore their correlates. A sample of 243 participants (18–88 years old), recruited online, completed an online survey collecting information on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, acceptability of transdiagnostic CBT treatments, specifically of Unified Protocol (UP), acceptability of group therapy, therapeutic format preferences, beliefs about group therapy and help-seeking attitudes. Most participants were receptive to and perceived as useful both unified transdiagnostic CBT and group therapy. Overall, participants presented significantly more favorable attitudes than unfavorable attitudes toward unified transdiagnostic CBT and group therapy (p < .001). Multivariate analyses revealed that (1) favorable attitudes toward transdiagnostic treatments were negatively associated with being employed and positively associated with living in an urban area, and higher efficacy scores; (2) unfavorable attitudes toward transdiagnostic treatments were positively associated with being married/cohabitating and negatively associated with vulnerability scores; (3) being female, living in an urban area, and higher efficacy and myth scores emerged as positive predictors of favorable attitudes toward group therapy; and (4) efficacy and vulnerability scores and help-seeking propensity emerged as negative predictors of unfavorable attitudes toward group therapy. These findings highlight the importance of delineating strategies to increase knowledge and acceptance of unified transdiagnostic CBT and group therapy in the Portuguese population, addressing specific individual characteristics.

Funder

Universidade de Coimbra

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference93 articles.

1. Alang, S. M., & McAlpine, D. D. (2019). Pathways to mental health services and perceptions about the effectiveness of treatment. Society and Mental Health, 9(3), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869318802341.

2. Ametaj, A. A., Wilner Tirpak, J., Cassiello-Robbins, C., Snow, R., Rassaby, M. M., Beer, K., & Sauer-Zavala, S. (2021). A preliminary investigation of provider attitudes toward a transdiagnostic treatment: Outcomes from training workshops with the unified protocol. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 48(4), 668–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01101-7.

3. Andersen, P., Toner, P., Bland, M., & McMillan, D. (2016). Effectiveness of transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety and depression in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 44(6), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465816000229.

4. Barbato, A., Vallarino, M., Rapisarda, F., Lora, A., & de Almeida, J. M. C. (2016). EU compass for action on mental health and well-being. Access to mental health care in Europe. Scientific paper. Funded by the European Union in the frame of the 3rd EU Health Programme (2014–2020). https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-12/ev_20161006_co04_en_0.pdf.

5. Barkowski, S., Schwartze, D., Strauss, B., Burlingame, G. M., & Rosendahl, J. (2020). Efficacy of group psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 30(8), 965–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2020.1729440.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3