The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review

Author:

Steenbruggen Rudi A.ORCID,Maas Marjo J. M.ORCID,Hoogeboom Thomas J.ORCID,Brand Paul L. P.ORCID,van der Wees Philip J.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The tracer method, commonly used for quality assessment, can also be used as a tool for peer observation and formative feedback on professional development. This scoping review describes how, by whom, and with what effect the tracer method is applied as a formative professional development instrument between healthcare professionals of equal status and aims to identify the types of scientific evidence for this use of the tracer method. Methods The authors searched four electronic databases for eligible articles, which were screened and assessed for eligibility by two independent researchers. From eligible studies, data were extracted to summarize, collate, and make a narrative account of the findings. Results The electronic search yielded 1757 unique studies, eight of which were included as valid and relevant to our aim: five qualitative, two mixed methods, and one quantitative study. Seven studies took place in hospitals and one in general practice. The tracer method was used mainly as a form of peer observation and formative feedback. Most studies evaluated the tracer method’s feasibility and its impact on professional development. All but one study reported positive effects: participants described the tracer method generally as being valuable and worth continuing. Discussion Although the body of evidence is small and largely limited to the hospital setting, using the tracer method for peer observation and formative feedback between healthcare professionals of equal status appears sufficiently useful to merit further rigorous evaluation and implementation in continuous professional development in healthcare.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference40 articles.

1. Kessner DM, Kalk CE, Singer J. Assessing health quality—the case for tracers. N Engl J Med. 1973;288:189–94.

2. Home [Internet]. Jointcommission.org. [cited 2 July, 2021]. Available from: https://www.jointcommission.org

3. Siewert B. The joint commission ever-readiness: Understanding tracer methodology. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018;47:131–5.

4. Introduction to on-site survey tracer methodology [Internet]. Accreditation.ca. [cited 2 July 2021]. Available from: https://store.accreditation.ca/products/introduction-to-on-site-survey-tracer-methodology

5. Bouchard C, Jean O. Tracer methodology: an appropriate tool for assessing compliance with accreditation standards? Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017;32:e299–315.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3