Abstract
AbstractUsing granular data from the OECD from 2010 to 2018 that differentiate between adaptation and mitigation measures to address climate change, we employed a double-hurdle model to examine whether countries’ Paris Agreement commitments and governance capacity help attract international climate-change-related financial aid. We found that (1) countries received a short-term aid boost in the year when they submitted the nationally determined contribution, and countries that committed only to action targets rather than emission goals were more likely to receive funds; (2) both the quality of the budget and financial management and the quality of public administration significantly enhanced the likelihood of receiving aid, but only the quality of public administration contributed to attracting funding for adaptations; and (3) multilateral institutions played catalytic roles in fostering bilateral international climate-change aid, particularly by increasing the likelihood of funding.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference42 articles.
1. Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business, New York
2. Aichele R, Felbermayr GJ (2015) Kyoto and carbon leakage: an empirical analysis of the carbon content of bilateral trade. Rev Econ Stat 97(1):104–115
3. Alexander, N., 2010. “The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) and Allocation of IDA Resources: Suggestions for Improvements to Benefit African Countries.” Heinrich Boell Foundation Report.
4. Anderson JE, Wincoop EV (2003) Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):170–192
5. Azam JP, Laffont JJ (2003) Contracting for aid. J Dev Econ 70:25–58
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献