Abstract
AbstractA growing body of empirical evidence suggests that land use change, and the resulting decline in both the area and quality of natural habitats, contributes to an increased incidence of disease in humans. Despite calls to leverage conservation policy to address the burden of disease linked to ecosystem change, the potential benefits are unknown. Efficiently reducing the burden of infectious disease through land use policies and conservation initiatives is challenging because it requires balancing trade-offs that depend on ecological and socioeconomic factors. To assess some of these trade-offs, we developed a dynamic model of optimal land use when ecosystem change affects the overall incidence of infectious disease. We compared the net benefits and paths of optimal policy in which the increased cost of disease resulting from natural habitat loss is included in the optimization with a base case where it is ignored. We found that ignoring the linkage between habitat degradation and infectious disease incidence in the planner’s problem reduces the net benefits of land management, such as conservation efforts, and results in significantly higher rates of infection and health costs.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Andrade MV, Noronha K, Diniz BPC, Guedes G, Carvalho LR, Silva VA, Calazans JA, Santos AS, Silva DN, Castro MC (2022) The economic burden of malaria: a systematic review. Malar J 21(1):283
2. Barbier EB, Burgess JC (1997) The Economics of Tropical Forest Land Use options. Land Econ 73(2):174–195
3. Bauch S (2004) Cost and rents to logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. PhD Thesis, Blacksburg, VA
4. Bauch SC, Birkenbach AM, Pattanayak SK, Sills EO (2015) Public health impacts of ecosystem change in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(24):7414–7419
5. Brouwer R, Pinto R, Dugstad A, Navrud S (2022) The economic value of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest ecosystem services: a meta-analysis of the Brazilian literature. PLoS ONE 17(5):e0268425