Abstract
AbstractThis paper investigates whether informative feedback on consumption can nudge water saving. We launched a five-month online information campaign which involved around 1,000 households located in the province of Milan (Italy) with a smart meter. A group of households received monthly reports via email on their per capita daily average water consumption, including a social comparison component. The Intention to Treat (ITT) analysis shows that, compared to a benchmark group, the units exposed to the intervention reduced their per capita water consumption by around 6% (25.8 liters per day or 6.8 gallons). Being able to observe the email opening rate, we find that the ITT effect is mainly driven by complying units. Through an Instrumental Variable approach, we estimated a Local Average Treatment Effect equal to 54.9 liters per day of water saving. A further Regression Discontinuity Design analysis shows that different feedback on consumption class size differentially affected water saving at the margin. We also found that the additional water saving increased with the number of monthly reports, though it did not persist two months after the campaign expired.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Firenze
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Abu-Bakar HH, Williams L, Hallett SH (2023) Contextualising household water consumption patterns in England: A socio-economic and socio-demographic narrative. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption 8:100104
2. Agarwal S, Goette L, Sing TF, Staake T, Tiefenbeck V (2017) The Role of Goals and Real-Time Feedback in Resource Conservation: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment. National University of Singapore, Singapore
3. Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am Econ Rev 104:3003–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3003
4. Andor MA, Fels KM (2018) Behavioral economics and energy conservation – A systematic review of non-price interventions and their causal effects. Ecol Econ 148:178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.018
5. Andor MA, Gerster A, Peters J, Schmidt CM (2020) Social norms and energy conservation beyond the US. J Environ Econ Manag 103:102351