Abstract
AbstractIn the debate on international waste trade, the focus on resource efficiency and recycling has gradually begun to accompany the focus on negative environmental externalities. In this context, we examine the impact of extended producer responsibility (EPR) on the export of waste batteries (WB). EPR is considered as a key policy for the “marketization of waste”. WB are a hazardous waste that also contain a high concentration of critical raw materials. As such, they are of strategic importance for the recovery of critical resources, while at the same time requiring proper environmental management. Therefore, it is crucial to understand where WB are treated and how this is affected by related policies. Our results, based on difference-in-difference models in a gravity framework, show a consistent increase in WB exports after EPR implementation compared to the trend for other wastes. This result is likely to be an indirect consequence of the ability of EPR to support growth in waste collection rates, more accurate tracking of transboundary waste flows, and specialization of national waste management systems. In particular, WB exports appear to be directed to countries with more advanced waste management systems, more stringent environmental regulations, and limited endowments of the mineral resources typically contained in batteries.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference129 articles.
1. Acosta A, Corallo A (2021) Extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes on used lead acid batteries (ULAB) in Latin American and the Caribbean Region, Intergovernmental network on chemicals and waste for Latin America and the Caribbean, UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
2. Agusdinata DB, Liu W (2023) Global sustainability of electric vehicles minerals: a critical review of news media. Extract Ind Soc 13:101231
3. Alves Dias P, Blagoeva D, Pavel C, Arvanitidis N (2018) Cobalt: demand-supply balances in the transition to electric mobility, Scientific analysis or review. In: Anticipation and foresight KJ-NA-29381-EN-N (online). European Union, Luxembourg
4. Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69:106–116
5. Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93:170–192